Laue diffraction behaviour in silver mosaic crystals at several gamma‐ray energies and orientations. Issue 2 (24th March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wade, Colin; Barrière, Nicolas; Hanlon, Lorraine; Bastie, Pierre; Fitzpatrick, Gerard; Jentschel, Michael; Roudil, Gilles; Von Ballmoos, Peter
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied crystallography. Volume 49:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 606
• Page End: 615
• Publication Date: 2016-03-24
• Subjects: Laue lenses -- Laue diffraction -- Darwin model -- mosaic crystals -- silver; Crystallography -- Periodicals; 548.05
• DOI: 10.1107/S1600576716002880
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8898

Abstract

Abstract : Cut silver crystals were tested at the Institute Laue–Langevin. Rocking curves were taken at multiple energies and crystallographic orientations and fitted using the Darwin model. For each crystal, the Darwin model gave values for the mosaicities and the crystallite sizes that were not consistent with one another. Abstract : The Laue lens is an emerging technology that uses crystal diffraction to concentrate gamma‐rays. The Darwin model describes diffraction in mosaic crystals at high energies (>50 keV) and is the basis for assessing the throughput of a Laue lens. While the Darwin model has been used successfully to describe binary alloys, it has shown inconsistencies when applied to diffraction with pure‐metal crystals. This paper presents a systematic study of diffraction in pure‐metal silver mosaic crystals and the performance of the Darwin model when applied to the data. Two cut silver crystals were tested at the Institute Laue–Langevin facility at three gamma‐ray energies and at three different crystallographic orientations. The rocking curves were fitted using the Darwin model. A single Gaussian for the distribution of crystallite orientations leads to poor quality fits. A crystallite distribution that is the sum of two Gaussians gives improved fits. However, for each crystal, the Darwin model gives mosaicities and crystallite sizes that are not consistent with one another as a function either of energy or of crystallographic orientation, despite these being physical properties of the materials. Without an adequate model to describe diffraction in pure‐metal crystals, either a Laue lens design must severely limit its catalogue of usable materials or each crystal in the design must be tested at the exact energy at which it is to be used. A more general theory to describe hard X‐ray diffraction using pure‐metal mosaic crystals, possibly involving a distribution of crystallite sizes, is therefore required.