Why direct effects of predation complicate the social brain hypothesis: And how incorporation of explicit proximate behavioral mechanisms might help. (13th May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: van der Bijl, Wouter; Kolm, Niclas
• Is Part Of: BioEssays. Volume 38:Number 6(2016:Jun.)
• Page Start: 568
• Page End: 577
• Publication Date: 2016-05-13
• Subjects: brain evolution -- brain size -- comparative method -- predation -- proximate mechanisms -- social brain hypothesis -- social complexity; Molecular biology -- Periodicals; Cytology -- Periodicals; Developmental biology -- Periodicals; 572.8
• DOI: 10.1002/bies.201500166
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0265-9247

Abstract

Abstract : A growing number of studies have found that large brains may help animals survive by avoiding predation. These studies provide an alternative explanation for existing correlative evidence for one of the dominant hypotheses regarding the evolution of brain size in animals, the social brain hypothesis (SBH). The SBH proposes that social complexity is a major evolutionary driver of large brains. However, if predation both directly selects for large brains and higher levels of sociality, correlations between sociality and brain size may be spurious. We argue that tests of the SBH should take direct effects of predation into account, either by explicitly including them in comparative analyses or by pin‐pointing the brain‐behavior‐fitness pathway through which the SBH operates. Existing data and theory on social behavior can then be used to identify precise candidate mechanisms and formulate new testable predictions. Abstract : Correlations between sociality and brain size have been hypothesized to stem from a causal link. But additional correlations of both variables with predation provide an alternative explanation. What are the evolutionary forces behind the evolution of large brains?