Feasibility of magnetic activation of a maxillofacial distraction osteogenesis, design of a new device. Issue 6 (June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boisson, J.; Strozyk, H.; Diner, P.; Picard, A.; Kadlub, N.
• Is Part Of: Journal of cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Volume 44:Issue 6(2016)
• Page Start: 684
• Page End: 688
• Publication Date: 2016-06
• Subjects: Distraction osteogenesis -- Distant activated distractor device -- Hemifacial microsomia -- Magnetic field; Skull -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- surgery -- Periodicals; Face -- surgery -- Periodicals; Skull -- surgery -- Periodicals; Oral Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; Surgery, Oral -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 617.514
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.03.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1010-5182

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Distraction osteogenesis is a technique of bone lengthening which uses the bone's natural healing process. Current devices for craniofacial distraction require a transmucosal or transcutaneous activator and are associated with numerous complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a rodless magnetic activation device that could be used in craniofacial distraction. Methods: The method is based on the torque applied between two unaligned permanent magnets. This torque depends on magnet size, shape, composition, magnetization and distance between the two magnets. Using a configuration close to that which would be applied in actual distraction osteogenesis (in terms of the distance between the two magnets), we performed an analytical study and evaluated the results. Results: We observed good agreement between the model and the experimental results, finding that the transmitted force value is comparable to the force required in mandibular distraction. Thus, we proposed a design of a new distracting device consisting of a cylindrical permanent magnet diametrically magnetized and fixed to an endless screw along its main axis. Activation of the distraction motion is achieved through interaction of the first magnet with a second cylindrical magnet whose magnetization is orthogonal to its main axis and to the device's endless screw. Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrates that magnetic activation for mandibular osteogenic distraction is feasible and that device size is not a constraint. We propose a prototypic device.