P.131 Lumbar fusion for degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (17th June 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- P.131 Lumbar fusion for degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (17th June 2016)
- Main Title:
- P.131 Lumbar fusion for degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Yavin, D
Isaacs, AM
Casha, S
Wiebe, S
Feasby, TE
Atta, C
Holroyd-Leduc, J
Hurlbert, RJ
Quan, H
Nataraj, A
Sutherland, GR
Jette, N - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Lumbar fusion for degenerative indications is associated with a great degree of practice variation. We summarize the current evidence on the comparative safety and efficacy of lumbar fusion, decompression alone, or non-operative care for degenerative indications.Methods: Literature search of electronic bibliographic databases was conducted. Comparative studies reporting validated measures of safety or efficacy were included. Treatments effects were calculated through DerSimonian and Laird random effects models.Results: We retrieved 62 studies (17 randomized controlled, 15 prospective, 15 retrospective, and 15 registries), enrolling a total 302, 347 adult patients. Disability, pain, and patient satisfaction following fusion, decompression alone, or non-operative care were dependent on surgical indications and study methodology. Relative to decompression alone, the risk of reoperation following fusion was increased for spinal stenosis (relative risk [RR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.30, p <0.004) and decreased for spondylolisthesis (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.84, p <0.001). In all indications, complications were more frequent following fusion (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.58, p <0.001). Mortality and treatment modality were not associated.Conclusions: Improvements were greatest in patients undergoing fusion for spondylolisthesis while complications limited the role of fusion for spinal stenosis. The relative safety and efficacy of fusion for chronic low back painAbstract : Background: Lumbar fusion for degenerative indications is associated with a great degree of practice variation. We summarize the current evidence on the comparative safety and efficacy of lumbar fusion, decompression alone, or non-operative care for degenerative indications.Methods: Literature search of electronic bibliographic databases was conducted. Comparative studies reporting validated measures of safety or efficacy were included. Treatments effects were calculated through DerSimonian and Laird random effects models.Results: We retrieved 62 studies (17 randomized controlled, 15 prospective, 15 retrospective, and 15 registries), enrolling a total 302, 347 adult patients. Disability, pain, and patient satisfaction following fusion, decompression alone, or non-operative care were dependent on surgical indications and study methodology. Relative to decompression alone, the risk of reoperation following fusion was increased for spinal stenosis (relative risk [RR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.30, p <0.004) and decreased for spondylolisthesis (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.84, p <0.001). In all indications, complications were more frequent following fusion (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.58, p <0.001). Mortality and treatment modality were not associated.Conclusions: Improvements were greatest in patients undergoing fusion for spondylolisthesis while complications limited the role of fusion for spinal stenosis. The relative safety and efficacy of fusion for chronic low back pain suggested careful patient selection is required. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Volume 43(2016)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Canadian journal of neurological sciences
- Issue:
- Volume 43(2016)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 43, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 43
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0043-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- S50
- Page End:
- S50
- Publication Date:
- 2016-06-17
- Subjects:
- Neurology -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=CJN ↗
http://www.cjns.org/home.html ↗
http://cjns.metapress.com/link.asp?id=300307 ↗
http://cjns.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0317-1671 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1017/cjn.2016.230 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0317-1671
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library STI - ELD Digital Store
- Ingest File:
- 2507.xml