VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE SPIRITUAL COPING STRATEGIES SCALE ARABIC VERSION IN SAUDI PATIENTS UNDERGOING HAEMODIALYSIS. Issue 2 (28th March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cruz, Jonas P.; Baldacchino, Donia R.; Alquwez, Nahed
• Is Part Of: Journal of renal care. Volume 42:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 107
• Page End: 114
• Publication Date: 2016-03-28
• Subjects: Chronic kidney disease -- Haemodialysis -- Holistic nursing -- Nursing -- Validity and reliability; Kidneys -- Diseases -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Hemodialysis -- Periodicals; Kidney Diseases -- nursing -- Periodicals; Renal Replacement Therapy -- nursing -- Periodicals; 616.61
• DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12155
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1755-6678

Abstract

SUMMARY: Background: Patients often resort to religious and spiritual activities to cope with physical and mental challenges. The effect of spiritual coping on overall health, adaptation and health‐related quality of life among patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) is well documented. Thus, it is essential to establish a valid and reliable instrument that can assess both the religious and non‐religious coping methods in patients undergoing HD. Objective: This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Spiritual Coping Strategies Scale Arabic version (SCS‐A) in Saudi patients undergoing HD. Method: A convenience sample of 60 Saudi patients undergoing HD was recruited for this descriptive, cross‐sectional study. Data were collected between May and June 2015. Forward–backward translation was used to formulate the SCS‐A. The SCS‐A, Muslim Religiosity Scale and the Quality of Life Index Dialysis Version III were used to procure the data. Internal consistency reliability, stability reliability, factor analysis and construct validity tests were performed. Analyses were set at the 0.05 level of significance. Results: The SCS‐A showed an acceptable internal consistency and strong stability reliability over time. The EFA produced two factors (non‐religious and religious coping). Satisfactory construct validity was established by the convergent and divergent validity and known‐groups method. Conclusion: The SCS‐A is a reliable and valid tool that can be used to measure the religious and non‐religious coping strategies of patients undergoing HD in Saudi Arabia and other Muslim and Arabic‐speaking countries.