Ultrafine particles in four European urban environments: Results from a new continuous long-term monitoring network. (July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hofman, J.; Staelens, J.; Cordell, R.; Stroobants, C.; Zikova, N.; Hama, S.M.L.; Wyche, K.P.; Kos, G.P.A.; Van Der Zee, S.; Smallbone, K.L.; Weijers, E.P.; Monks, P.S.; Roekens, E.
• Is Part Of: Atmospheric environment. Volume 136(2016)
• Page Start: 68
• Page End: 81
• Publication Date: 2016-07
• Subjects: UFP -- Urban particle size distribution -- Amsterdam -- Antwerp -- Leicester -- London; Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Meteorological aspects -- Periodicals; 551.51
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-2310

Abstract

Abstract: To gain a better understanding on the spatiotemporal variation of ultrafine particles (UFPs) in urban environments, this study reports on the first results of a long-term UFP monitoring network, set up in Amsterdam (NL), Antwerp (BE), Leicester (UK) and London (UK). Total number concentrations and size distributions were assessed during 1–2 years at four fixed urban background sites, supplemented with mobile trailer measurements for co-location monitoring and additional short-term monitoring sites. Intra- and interurban spatiotemporal UFP variation, associations with commonly-monitored pollutants (PM, NOx and BC) and impacts of wind fields were evaluated. Although comparable size distributions were observed between the four cities, source-related differences were demonstrated within specific particle size classes. Total and size-resolved particle number concentrations showed clear traffic-related temporal variation, confirming road traffic as the major UFP contributor in urban environments. New particle formation events were observed in all cities. Correlations with typical traffic-related pollutants (BC and NOx ) were obtained for all monitoring stations, except for Amsterdam, which might be attributable to UFP emissions from Schiphol airport. The temporal variation in particle number concentration correlated fairly weakly between the four cities (rs = 0.28−0.50, COD = 0.28−0.37), yet improved significantly inside individual cities (rs = 0.59−0.77). Nevertheless, considerable differences were still obtained in terms of particle numbers (20–38% for total particle numbers and up to 49% for size-resolved particle numbers), confirming the importance of local source contributions and the need for careful consideration when allocating UFP monitoring stations in heterogeneous urban environments. Highlights: We evaluated spatiotemporal UFP levels in Amsterdam, Antwerp, Leicester and London. Size-resolved particle numbers provide valuable information on contributing sources. Road traffic seems to be a major UFP contributor in the studied urban environments. New particle formation (NPF) events were observed in all cities. Consideration is needed when allocating UFP monitoring sites in urban environments.