Unidirectional diploid–tetraploid introgression among British birch trees with shifting ranges shown by restriction site‐associated markers. Issue 11 (11th May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zohren, Jasmin; Wang, Nian; Kardailsky, Igor; Borrell, James S.; Joecker, Anika; Nichols, Richard A.; Buggs, Richard J. A.
• Other Names: Abbott Richard J. guestEditor.; Barton Nicholas H. guestEditor.; Good Jeffrey M. guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Molecular ecology. Volume 25:Issue 11(2016)
• Page Start: 2413
• Page End: 2426
• Publication Date: 2016-05-11
• Subjects: climate change -- genotyping -- hybridization -- introgression -- polyploidy; Molecular ecology -- Periodicals; Molecular population biology -- Periodicals; 576
• DOI: 10.1111/mec.13644
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-1083

Abstract

Abstract: Hybridization may lead to introgression of genes among species. Introgression may be bidirectional or unidirectional, depending on factors such as the demography of the hybridizing species, or the nature of reproductive barriers between them. Previous microsatellite studies suggested bidirectional introgression between diploid Betula nana (dwarf birch) and tetraploid B. pubescens (downy birch) and also between B. pubescens and diploid B. pendula (silver birch) in Britain. Here, we analyse introgression among these species using 51 237 variants in restriction site‐associated (RAD) markers in 194 individuals, called with allele dosages in the tetraploids. In contrast to the microsatellite study, we found unidirectional introgression into B. pubescens from both of the diploid species. This pattern fits better with the expected nature of the reproductive barrier between diploids and tetraploids. As in the microsatellite study, introgression into B. pubescens showed clear clines with increasing introgression from B. nana in the north and from B. pendula in the south. Unlike B. pendula alleles, introgression of B. nana alleles was found far from the current area of sympatry or allopatry between B. nana and B. pubescens . This pattern fits a shifting zone of hybridization due to Holocene reduction in the range of B. nana and expansion in the range of B. pubescens .