Modular organisation of inducer recognition and allostery in the tetracycline repressor. (20th April 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Modular organisation of inducer recognition and allostery in the tetracycline repressor. (20th April 2016)
- Main Title:
- Modular organisation of inducer recognition and allostery in the tetracycline repressor
- Authors:
- Werten, Sebastiaan
Schneider, Julia
Palm, Gottfried Julius
Hinrichs, Winfried - Abstract:
- Abstract : Induction of the tetracycline repressor (TetR) results from antibiotic‐dependent changes in the relative positioning of the DNA‐binding domains within the promoter‐associated repressor dimer, but the key determinants of this allosteric effect remain poorly characterised. Intriguingly, previous mutational analyses of the tetracycline‐interacting site revealed a lack of correlation between residual affinity and induction propensity, suggesting that some of the residues in contact with the antibiotic primarily act in ligand recognition and retention, whereas others are required to transmit the allosteric signal. Here, we provide a structural basis for these observations via crystallographic analysis of the point mutants N82A, H100A, T103A and E147A in complex with the inducer 5a, 6‐anhydrotetracycline. In conjunction with the available functional data, the four structures demonstrate that a trigger‐like movement of the region between helices α6 and α7 towards and into the binding site plays a decisive role in the intramolecular communication process. In sharp contrast, residues lining the binding cavity proper have little or no influence on the allosteric mechanism as such. This nearly complete physical separation of ligand recognition and allostery will have allowed diverging TetR‐like repressors to bind novel effectors while the existing induction mechanism remained intact. Consequently, the modularity described here may have been a key factor in the evolutionaryAbstract : Induction of the tetracycline repressor (TetR) results from antibiotic‐dependent changes in the relative positioning of the DNA‐binding domains within the promoter‐associated repressor dimer, but the key determinants of this allosteric effect remain poorly characterised. Intriguingly, previous mutational analyses of the tetracycline‐interacting site revealed a lack of correlation between residual affinity and induction propensity, suggesting that some of the residues in contact with the antibiotic primarily act in ligand recognition and retention, whereas others are required to transmit the allosteric signal. Here, we provide a structural basis for these observations via crystallographic analysis of the point mutants N82A, H100A, T103A and E147A in complex with the inducer 5a, 6‐anhydrotetracycline. In conjunction with the available functional data, the four structures demonstrate that a trigger‐like movement of the region between helices α6 and α7 towards and into the binding site plays a decisive role in the intramolecular communication process. In sharp contrast, residues lining the binding cavity proper have little or no influence on the allosteric mechanism as such. This nearly complete physical separation of ligand recognition and allostery will have allowed diverging TetR‐like repressors to bind novel effectors while the existing induction mechanism remained intact. Consequently, the modularity described here may have been a key factor in the evolutionary success of the widespread and highly diversified repressor class. Database: Structural data are available in the Protein Data Bank under the accession numbers5FKK, 5FKL, 5FKM, 5FKN and5FKO . Abstract : Crystallographic analysis of selected tetracycline repressor (TetR) mutants reveals dedicated structural modules required for inducer specificity and allosteric control of target promoter binding. In the course of evolution, this modular architecture will have enabled diverging TetR‐like factors to rapidly adapt to novel effector molecules and nascent regulatory circuits while the existing allosteric mechanism remained functional. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- FEBS journal. Volume 283:Number 11(2016)
- Journal:
- FEBS journal
- Issue:
- Volume 283:Number 11(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 283, Issue 11 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 283
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0283-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 2102
- Page End:
- 2114
- Publication Date:
- 2016-04-20
- Subjects:
- antibiotic resistance -- conformational change -- evolution -- ligand binding -- transcription regulation
Biochemistry -- Periodicals
Molecular biology -- Periodicals
Pathology, Molecular -- Periodicals
572 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=01038983-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=ejb ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=ejb ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/febs.13723 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1742-464X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3901.578500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2361.xml