Identification of landscape features influencing gene flow: How useful are habitat selection models?. (3rd June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Roffler, Gretchen H.; Schwartz, Michael K.; Pilgrim, Kristy L.; Talbot, Sandra L.; Sage, George K.; Adams, Layne G.; Luikart, Gordon
• Is Part Of: Evolutionary applications. Volume 9:Number 6(2016)
• Page Start: 805
• Page End: 817
• Publication Date: 2016-06-03
• Subjects: dispersal -- landscape genetics -- multiple regression on distance matrices -- Ovis dalli dalli -- population connectivity -- resistance surfaces -- resource selection function; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; Genetics -- Periodicals; Natural selection -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 576.8
• DOI: 10.1111/eva.12389
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1752-4571

Abstract

Abstract: Understanding how dispersal patterns are influenced by landscape heterogeneity is critical for modeling species connectivity. Resource selection function (RSF) models are increasingly used in landscape genetics approaches. However, because the ecological factors that drive habitat selection may be different from those influencing dispersal and gene flow, it is important to consider explicit assumptions and spatial scales of measurement. We calculated pairwise genetic distance among 301 Dall's sheep ( Ovis dalli dalli ) in southcentral Alaska using an intensive noninvasive sampling effort and 15 microsatellite loci. We used multiple regression of distance matrices to assess the correlation of pairwise genetic distance and landscape resistance derived from an RSF, and combinations of landscape features hypothesized to influence dispersal. Dall's sheep gene flow was positively correlated with steep slopes, moderate peak normalized difference vegetation indices (NDVI), and open land cover. Whereas RSF covariates were significant in predicting genetic distance, the RSF model itself was not significantly correlated with Dall's sheep gene flow, suggesting that certain habitat features important during summer (rugged terrain, mid‐range elevation) were not influential to effective dispersal. This work underscores that consideration of both habitat selection and landscape genetics models may be useful in developing management strategies to both meet the immediate survival of a species and allow for long‐term genetic connectivity.