Exploring multifractal‐based features for mild Alzheimer's disease classification. Issue 1 (20th July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ni, Huangjing; Zhou, Luping; Ning, Xinbao; Wang, Lei
• Is Part Of: Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 76:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 259
• Page End: 269
• Publication Date: 2015-07-20
• Subjects: multifractal -- Alzheimer's disease -- classification -- multiple kernel learning; Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals; Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals; 616.07548
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25853
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0740-3194

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Multifractal applications to resting state functional MRI (rs‐fMRI) time series for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) are still limited. We aim to address two issues: (I) if and what multifractal features are sufficiently discriminative to detect AD from the healthy; (II) if AD classification could be further improved by combining multifractal features with traditional features in this field. Methods: Rs‐fMRI data of 25 AD patients and 38 normal controls were analyzed. A set of multifractal features were systematically investigated. Traditional features in monofractal, linear, and network‐based categories were also extracted for comparison and combination. Both support vector machines and multiple kernel learning (MKL) were used to perform classification with individual and combined features. Results: We identified a multifractal feature, Δ f, which has the strongest discriminative power among all the features in our study. Moreover, we found that the classification accuracy could be significantly improved from 69% (by Δ f only) to up to 76%, when nonsparse MKL is used to combine Δ f with the monofractal feature, Hurst. Finally, we showed that incorporating other multifractal features, α ( 0 ), Δ α and P c, could also improve traditional‐feature‐based AD classification. Conclusion: Our work demonstrated the potential usefulness of multifractal analysis for AD research, especially when combining with the traditional rs‐fMRI features. It contributes to distinguishing AD from NC subjects. Magn Reson Med 76:259–269, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.