A dynamic stochastic model for evaluating congestion and crowding effects in transit systems. (July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cats, Oded; West, Jens; Eliasson, Jonas
• Is Part Of: Transportation research. Volume 89(2016)
• Page Start: 43
• Page End: 57
• Publication Date: 2016-07
• Subjects: Transit assignment -- Capacity -- Dynamic congestion -- Agent-based simulation -- Cost-benefit analysis; Transportation -- Research -- Periodicals; Transportation -- Mathematical models -- Periodicals
• DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0191-2615

Abstract

Highlights: Modelling public transport congestion: crowding, denied boarding and reliability. An agent-based transit simulation is applied to a case study of a metro extension. Dynamic congestion effects amount to more than a third of travel time savings. Appraisal of public transport capacity expansions must consider congestion dynamics. Abstract: One of the most common motivations for public transport investments is to reduce congestion and increase capacity. Public transport congestion leads to crowding discomfort, denied boardings and lower service reliability. However, transit assignment models and appraisal methodologies usually do not account for the dynamics of public transport congestion and crowding and thus potentially underestimate the related benefits. This study develops a method to capture the benefits of increased capacity by using a dynamic and stochastic transit assignment model. Using an agent-based public transport simulation model, we dynamically model the evolution of network reliability and on-board crowding. The model is embedded in a comprehensive framework for project appraisal. A case study of a metro extension that partially replaces an overloaded bus network in Stockholm demonstrates that congestion effects may account for a substantial share of the expected benefits. A cost-benefit analysis based on a conventional static model will miss more than a third of the benefits. This suggests that failure to represent dynamic congestion effects may substantially underestimate the benefits of projects, especially if they are primarily intended to increase capacity rather than to reduce travel times.