Systematic impact of institutional pressures on safety climate in the construction industry. (August 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Systematic impact of institutional pressures on safety climate in the construction industry. (August 2016)
- Main Title:
- Systematic impact of institutional pressures on safety climate in the construction industry
- Authors:
- He, Qinghua
Dong, Shuang
Rose, Timothy
Li, Heng
Yin, Qin
Cao, Dongping - Abstract:
- Highlights: The organizational management commitment to safety and employee involvement are positively related to all three kinds of institutional pressure. The responsibility perception to safety and health is significantly influenced by coercive and mimetic pressure. No significant effects of coercive and normative pressures on the applicability of safety rules and work practices. The importance of external organizational pressures in improving project safety climate in a systematical view. Abstract: This paper explores how three types of institutional pressure (i.e., coercive, mimetic and normative pressures) systematically impact on the safety climate of construction projects. These impacts are empirically tested by survey data collected from 186 questionnaires of construction companies operating in Shanghai, China. The results, obtained by partial least squares analysis, show that organizational management commitment to safety and employee involvement is positively related to all three institutional pressures, while the perception of responsibility for safety and health is significantly influenced by coercive and mimetic pressure. However, coercive and normative pressures have no significant effect on the applicability of safety rules and work practices, revealing the importance of external organizational pressures in improving project safety climate from a systematic view. The findings also provide insights into the use of institutional forces to facilitate theHighlights: The organizational management commitment to safety and employee involvement are positively related to all three kinds of institutional pressure. The responsibility perception to safety and health is significantly influenced by coercive and mimetic pressure. No significant effects of coercive and normative pressures on the applicability of safety rules and work practices. The importance of external organizational pressures in improving project safety climate in a systematical view. Abstract: This paper explores how three types of institutional pressure (i.e., coercive, mimetic and normative pressures) systematically impact on the safety climate of construction projects. These impacts are empirically tested by survey data collected from 186 questionnaires of construction companies operating in Shanghai, China. The results, obtained by partial least squares analysis, show that organizational management commitment to safety and employee involvement is positively related to all three institutional pressures, while the perception of responsibility for safety and health is significantly influenced by coercive and mimetic pressure. However, coercive and normative pressures have no significant effect on the applicability of safety rules and work practices, revealing the importance of external organizational pressures in improving project safety climate from a systematic view. The findings also provide insights into the use of institutional forces to facilitate the improvement of safety climate in the construction industry. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Accident analysis and prevention. Volume 93(2016)
- Journal:
- Accident analysis and prevention
- Issue:
- Volume 93(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 93, Issue 2016 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 93
- Issue:
- 2016
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0093-2016-0000
- Page Start:
- 230
- Page End:
- 239
- Publication Date:
- 2016-08
- Subjects:
- Safety climate -- Institutional theory -- Institutional pressures -- Systematic effects -- Construction industry
Accidents -- Prevention -- Periodicals
Accident Prevention -- Periodicals
Accidents -- Prévention -- Périodiques
363.106 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00014575 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.034 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0001-4575
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0573.130000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2565.xml