In two minds: how reflections influence software design thinking. Issue 6 (20th May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Razavian, Maryam; Tang, Antony; Capilla, Rafael; Lago, Patricia
• Is Part Of: Journal of software. Volume 28:Issue 6(2016)
• Page Start: 394
• Page End: 426
• Publication Date: 2016-05-20
• Subjects: software design -- design reasoning -- reflection -- behavioral software engineering; Software engineering -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Development -- Periodicals; Software maintenance -- Periodicals; 005.1
• DOI: 10.1002/smr.1776
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-7473

Abstract

Abstract: We theorize a two‐mind model of design thinking. Mind 1 is about logical design reasoning, and Mind 2 is about the reflection on our reasoning and judgments. The problem solving ability of Mind 1 has often been emphasized in software engineering. The reflective Mind 2, however, has not received much attention. In this study, we want to find out if Mind 2, or reflection, can improve design discourse, a prerequisite of design quality. We conducted multiple case studies with 12 student groups, divided into test groups and control groups. We provided external reflections to the test groups. No reflections were given to the control groups. We analyzed the quality of the design discourse in both groups. We found that reflection (Mind 2) improves the quality of design discourse (Mind 1) under certain preconditions. The results highlight the significance of reflection as a mean to improve the quality of design discourse. We conclude that software designers need both Mind 1 and Mind 2 to obtain a higher quality design discourse, as a foundation for a good design. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Abstract : Reflection (Mind 2) helps in improving the quality of design discourse (Mind 1). We classified two types of reflections: (i) external reflections made by a third party to the designers and (ii) internal reflections as challenges self‐raised by the designers. Software designers need both Mind 1 and Mind 2 to obtain a higher‐quality design discourse as a foundation for a good design.