Fast versus slow weight loss: development process and rationale behind the dietary interventions for the TEMPO Diet Trial. (31st May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gibson, A. A.; Seimon, R. V.; Franklin, J.; Markovic, T. P.; Byrne, N. M.; Manson, E.; Caterson, I. D.; Sainsbury, A.
• Is Part Of: Obesity science and practice. Volume 2:Number 2(2016)
• Page Start: 162
• Page End: 173
• Publication Date: 2016-05-31
• Subjects: Clinical protocol -- dietary protein -- diet‐reducing -- energy intake; Obesity -- Periodicals; 616.398005
• DOI: 10.1002/osp4.48
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2055-2238

Abstract

Summary: Objective and methods: Finding effective solutions to curb the obesity epidemic is a great global public health challenge. The need for long‐term follow‐up necessitates weight loss trials conducted in real‐world settings, outside the confines of tightly controlled laboratory or clinic conditions. Given the complexity of eating behaviour and the food supply, this makes the process of designing a practical dietary intervention that stands up to scientific rigor difficult. Detailed information about the dietary intervention itself, as well as the process of developing the final intervention and its underlying rationale, is rarely reported in scientific weight management publications but is valuable and essential for translating research into practice. Thus, this paper describes the design process and underlying rationale behind the dietary interventions in an exemplar weight loss trial – the TEMPO Diet Trial (Type of Energy Manipulation for Promoting optimal metabolic health and body composition in Obesity). This trial assesses the long‐term effects of fast versus slow weight loss on adiposity, fat free mass, muscle strength and bone density in women with obesity (body mass index 30–40 kg m −2 ) that are 45–65 years of age, postmenopausal and sedentary. Results and conclusions: This paper is intended as a resource for researchers and/or clinicians to illustrate how theoretical values based on a hypothesis can be translated into a dietary weight loss intervention to be used in free‐living women of varying sizes.