Factors related to allergic transfusion reactions and febrile non‐haemolytic transfusion reactions in children. Issue 4 (25th January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yanagisawa, R.; Shimodaira, S.; Sakashita, K.; Hidaka, Y.; Kojima, S.; Nishijima, F.; Hidaka, E.; Shiohara, M.; Nakamura, T.
• Is Part Of: Vox sanguinis. Volume 110:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 376
• Page End: 384
• Publication Date: 2016-01-25
• Subjects: allergic transfusion reaction -- diversion method -- febrile non‐haemolytic transfusion reaction -- platelet concentrate -- red cell concentrate -- transfusion‐related adverse reaction; Blood -- Periodicals; Blood -- Transfusion -- Periodicals; Immunohematology -- Periodicals; Immunopathology -- Periodicals; 615.39
• DOI: 10.1111/vox.12373
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0042-9007

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Objectives: Allergic transfusion reactions (ATRs) and febrile non‐haemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs) are the two major types of transfusion‐related adverse reactions (TRARs). Although prestorage leucocyte reduction and diversion of the first aliquot of blood (LR/D) could reduce FNHTRs and bacterial contamination in adult transfusion, ATRs are still problematic. In addition, there is little information about TRARs in paediatric population. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single‐centre retrospective analysis of all transfusions, except washing products, and TRARs for 153 months to evaluate related factors such as delivery of treatment and the characteristics of recipients. Results: Most TRARs were FNHTRs and/or ATRs in children. In delivering blood products with LR/D, the frequencies of not only FNHTRs but also ATRs were significantly reduced with both platelet concentrates (PCs) and red cell concentrates (RCCs). TRARs of fresh‐frozen plasma were infrequent in children. In addition, even after the introduction of LR/D, ATRs were significantly more frequent in patients with primary haematological and malignant diseases who received PCs and RCCs, older patients who received PCs and patients who received frequent RCCs. Conclusion: These results suggest that leucocytes or mediators from leucocytes are underlying cause of ATRs in addition to FNHTRs in children. Furthermore, particular characteristics of patients would be other risk factors for ATRs.