Flow cytometry as an improved method for the titration of Chlamydiaceae and other intracellular bacteria. Issue 5 (5th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Käser, T.; Pasternak, J. A.; Hamonic, G.; Rieder, M.; Lai, K.; Delgado‐Ortega, M.; Gerdts, V.; Meurens, F.
• Is Part Of: Cytometry. Volume 89:Issue 5(2016)
• Page Start: 451
• Page End: 460
• Publication Date: 2016-02-05
• Subjects: Chlamydiaceae -- Chlamydia suis -- intracellular bacteria -- titration -- flow cytometry -- FCM; Flow cytometry -- Periodicals; Imaging systems in biology -- Periodicals; Imaging systems in medicine -- Periodicals; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; 571.605
• DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22822
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-4922

Abstract

Abstract: Chlamydiaceae is a family of intracellular bacteria causing a range of diverse pathological outcomes. The most devastating human diseases are ocular infections with C. trachomatis leading to blindness and genital infections causing pelvic inflammatory disease with long‐term sequelae including infertility and chronic pelvic pain. In order to enable the comparison of experiments between laboratories investigating host‐chlamydia interactions, the infectious titer has to be determined. Titer determination of chlamydia is most commonly performed via microscopy of host cells infected with a serial dilution of chlamydia. However, other methods including fluorescent ELISpot (Fluorospot) and DNA Chip Scanning Technology have also been proposed to enumerate chlamydia‐infected cells. For viruses, flow cytometry has been suggested as a superior alternative to standard titration methods. In this study we compared the use of flow cytometry with microscopy and Fluorospot for the titration of C. suis as a representative of other intracellular bacteria. Titer determination via Fluorospot was unreliable, while titration via microscopy led to a linear read‐out range of 16 − 64 dilutions and moderate reproducibility with acceptable standard deviations within and between investigators. In contrast, flow cytometry had a vast linear read‐out range of 1, 024 dilutions and the lowest standard deviations given a basic training in these methods. In addition, flow cytometry was faster and material costs were lower compared to microscopy. Flow cytometry offers a fast, cheap, precise, and reproducible alternative for the titration of intracellular bacteria like C. suis . © 2016 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry