Speech characteristics after articulation therapy in children with cleft palate and velopharyngeal dysfunction – A single case experimental design. (July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Derakhshandeh, Fatemeh; Nikmaram, Mohammadreza; Hosseinabad, Hedieh Hashemi; Memarzadeh, Mehrdad; Taheri, Masoud; Omrani, Mohammadreza; Jalaie, Shohreh; Bijankhan, Mahmood; Sell, Debbie
• Is Part Of: International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. Volume 86(2016:Jul.)
• Page Start: 104
• Page End: 113
• Publication Date: 2016-07
• Subjects: Cleft palate -- Non-oral CSCs -- Passive CSCs -- Speech -- Single case experimental design -- VPI -- Articulation therapy; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; Pediatrics -- Periodicals; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; Pediatrics -- Periodicals; Oto-rhino-laryngologie -- Périodiques; Pédiatrie -- Périodiques; 618.9209751
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.04.025
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0165-5876

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of an intensive 10-week course of articulation therapy on articulation errors in cleft lip and palate patients who have Velopharyngeal Insufficiency (VPI), non-oral and passive cleft speech characteristics. Methods: Five children with cleft palate (+/-cleft lip) with VPI and non-oral and passive cleft speech characteristics underwent 40 intensive articulation therapies over 10 weeks in a single case experimental design. The percentage of non-oral CSCs (NCSCs), passive CSCs (PCSCs), stimulable consonants (SC), correct consonants in word imitation (CCI), and correct consonants in picture naming (CCN) were captured at baseline, during intervention and in follow up phases. Visual analysis and two effect size indexes of Percentage of Nonoverlapping Data and Percentage of Improvement Rate Difference were analyzed. Results: Articulation therapy resulted in visible decrease in NCSCs for all 5 participants across the intervention phases. Intervention was effective in changing percentage of passive CSCs in two different ways; it reduced the PCSCs in three cases and resulted in an increase in PCSCs in the other two cases. This was interpreted as intervention having changed the non-oral CSCs to consonants produced within the oral cavity but with passive characteristics affecting manner of production including weakness, nasalized plosives and nasal realizations of plosives and fricatives. Percent SC increased throughout the intervention period in all five patients. All participants demonstrated an increase in percentage of CCI and CCN suggesting an increase in the consonant inventory. Follow-up data showed that all the subjects were able to maintain their ability to articulate learned phonemes correctly even after a 4-week break from intervention. Conclusion: This single case experimental study supports the hypothesis that speech intervention in patients with VPI can result in an improvement in oral placements and passive CSCs.