64 slice-coronary computed tomography sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft stenosis: A meta-analysis. (1st August 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 64 slice-coronary computed tomography sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft stenosis: A meta-analysis. (1st August 2016)
- Main Title:
- 64 slice-coronary computed tomography sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft stenosis: A meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Barbero, Umberto
Iannaccone, Mario
d'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
Barbero, Cristina
Mohamed, Abdirashid
Annone, Umberto
Benedetto, Sara
Celentani, Dario
Gagliardi, Marco
Moretti, Claudio
Gaita, Fiorenzo - Abstract:
- Abstract: A non-invasive approach to define grafts patency and stenosis in the follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients may be an interesting alternative to coronary angiography. 64-slice-coronary computed tomography is nowadays a diffused non-invasive method that permits an accurate evaluation of coronary stenosis, due to a high temporal and spatial resolution. However, its sensitivity and specificity in CABG evaluation has to be clearly defined, since published studies used different protocols and scanners. We collected all studies investigating patients with stable symptoms and previous CABG and reporting the comparison between diagnostic performances of invasive coronary angiography and 64-slice-coronary computed tomography. As a result, sensitivity and specificity of 64-slice-coronary computed tomography for CABG occlusion were 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–1.00) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99–1.00) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99. 64-slice-coronary computed tomography sensitivity and specificity for the presence of any CABG stenosis > 50% were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.98), while AUC was 0.99. At meta-regression, neither the age nor the time from graft implantation had effect on sensitivity and specificity of 64-slice-coronary computed tomography detection of significant CABG stenosis or occlusion. In conclusion 64-slice-coronary computed tomography confirmed its high sensitivity and specificity in CABG stenosis or occlusion evaluation.Abstract: A non-invasive approach to define grafts patency and stenosis in the follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients may be an interesting alternative to coronary angiography. 64-slice-coronary computed tomography is nowadays a diffused non-invasive method that permits an accurate evaluation of coronary stenosis, due to a high temporal and spatial resolution. However, its sensitivity and specificity in CABG evaluation has to be clearly defined, since published studies used different protocols and scanners. We collected all studies investigating patients with stable symptoms and previous CABG and reporting the comparison between diagnostic performances of invasive coronary angiography and 64-slice-coronary computed tomography. As a result, sensitivity and specificity of 64-slice-coronary computed tomography for CABG occlusion were 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–1.00) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99–1.00) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99. 64-slice-coronary computed tomography sensitivity and specificity for the presence of any CABG stenosis > 50% were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.98), while AUC was 0.99. At meta-regression, neither the age nor the time from graft implantation had effect on sensitivity and specificity of 64-slice-coronary computed tomography detection of significant CABG stenosis or occlusion. In conclusion 64-slice-coronary computed tomography confirmed its high sensitivity and specificity in CABG stenosis or occlusion evaluation. Highlights: 64-slice-CCT permits an accurate evaluation of by-pass grafts. Sensitivity and specificity of 64-slice-CCT are very high for by-pass occlusion and stenosis detection. Neither the age nor the time from graft implantation affects sensitivity and specificity of 64-slice-CCT. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of cardiology. Volume 216(2016)
- Journal:
- International journal of cardiology
- Issue:
- Volume 216(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 216, Issue 2016 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 216
- Issue:
- 2016
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0216-2016-0000
- Page Start:
- 52
- Page End:
- 57
- Publication Date:
- 2016-08-01
- Subjects:
- Coronary computed tomography -- Coronary artery stenosis -- Coronary artery disease -- Coronary artery by-pass graft
Cardiology -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.12 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01675273 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01675273 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.156 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-5273
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.158000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1442.xml