Hierarchical mixture of experts and diagnostic modeling approach to reduce hydrologic model structural uncertainty. Issue 4 (3rd April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moges, Edom; Demissie, Yonas; Li, Hong‐Yi
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 52:Issue 4(2016:Apr.)
• Page Start: 2551
• Page End: 2570
• Publication Date: 2016-04-03
• Subjects: diagnostic modeling -- structural uncertainty -- Hierarchical Mixture of Experts -- model averaging -- model adequacy; Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1002/2015WR018266
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

Abstract: In most water resources applications, any particular model structure might be inadequate to capture the dynamic multiscale interactions among different hydrological processes. Calibrating single models for dynamic catchments, where multiple dominant processes exist, can result in displacement of errors from structure to parameters, which in turn leads to over‐correction and biased predictions. An alternative to a single model structure is to develop local expert structures that are effective in representing the dominant components of the hydrologic process and adaptively integrate them based on an indicator variable. In this study, the Hierarchical Mixture of Experts (HME) framework is applied to integrate expert model structures representing the different components of the hydrologic process. Various signature diagnostic analyses were used to identify the presence of multiple dominant processes, and the adequacy of a single model, as well as to develop the structures of the expert models. The approaches are applied for two distinct catchments, the Guadalupe River (Texas) and the French Broad River (North Carolina) from the Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX), using different structures of the HBV model. The results show that the HME approach has a better performance over the single model for the Guadalupe catchment, where multiple dominant processes are witnessed through diagnostic measures. Whereas the diagnostics and aggregated performance measures prove that French Broad has a homogeneous catchment response, making the single model adequate to capture the response. Key Points: Identification of homogeneous and dynamic catchment responses through hydrological signatures Diagnosing model structural inadequacy Application of Hierarchical Mixture of Experts for dynamic response catchments