The importance of determining the limit of detection of non‐invasive prenatal testing methods. (21st February 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The importance of determining the limit of detection of non‐invasive prenatal testing methods. (21st February 2016)
- Main Title:
- The importance of determining the limit of detection of non‐invasive prenatal testing methods
- Authors:
- Fiorentino, Francesco
Bono, Sara
Pizzuti, Francesca
Mariano, Martina
Polverari, Arianna
Duca, Sara
Sessa, Mariateresa
Baldi, Marina
Diano, Laura
Spinella, Francesca - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: Several non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) methods, which analyze circulating fetal cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma, suggest a fetal fraction (FF) ≥4% for a reportable result, with the assumption that fetal aneuploidies may not be detectable at lower FF. This study determined the actual limit of detection (LOD) of a massively parallel sequencing‐based NIPT method and evaluated its performance in testing samples with low FF. Method: An experimental model, involving the creation of artificial plasma mixtures with a final aneuploid FF ranging from 1% to 4%, simulated samples at different proportions of fetal cfDNA. We then analyzed 7103 blood samples, from pregnant women undergoing NIPT, to assess the impact of low FF on the performance of cfDNA testing. Results: Detection of common aneuploidies in samples with an FF as low as 2% is well within the ability of this technology. Of 105 pregnancies confirmed chromosomally abnormal, 25 (23.8%) involving a 2% < FF < 4% were consistently detected. These high‐risk pregnancies would have not been identified using the suggested 4% FF cut‐off. Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of determining the actual LOD for each specific NIPT methodology. It may reduce the incidence of test cancelations and shorten the time required for the diagnosis of aneuploidy. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Abstract : What′s Already Known About This Topic? Several non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) methods thatAbstract: Objective: Several non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) methods, which analyze circulating fetal cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma, suggest a fetal fraction (FF) ≥4% for a reportable result, with the assumption that fetal aneuploidies may not be detectable at lower FF. This study determined the actual limit of detection (LOD) of a massively parallel sequencing‐based NIPT method and evaluated its performance in testing samples with low FF. Method: An experimental model, involving the creation of artificial plasma mixtures with a final aneuploid FF ranging from 1% to 4%, simulated samples at different proportions of fetal cfDNA. We then analyzed 7103 blood samples, from pregnant women undergoing NIPT, to assess the impact of low FF on the performance of cfDNA testing. Results: Detection of common aneuploidies in samples with an FF as low as 2% is well within the ability of this technology. Of 105 pregnancies confirmed chromosomally abnormal, 25 (23.8%) involving a 2% < FF < 4% were consistently detected. These high‐risk pregnancies would have not been identified using the suggested 4% FF cut‐off. Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of determining the actual LOD for each specific NIPT methodology. It may reduce the incidence of test cancelations and shorten the time required for the diagnosis of aneuploidy. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Abstract : What′s Already Known About This Topic? Several non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) methods that rely on quantification of fetal cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) suggest a fetal fraction (FF) of 4% or greater for a reportable result. The 4% FF cut‐off was theoretically determined, with the assumption that fetal aneuploidies may not be detectable at lower FF. What Does This Study Add? This study demonstrates that the minimum FF level necessary for accurate aneuploidy assessment should be related to the actual limit of detection (LOD) of each specific NIPT approach used and not necessarily fixed at 4% for all cfDNA testing methodologies. The determination of the LOD is advisable for any NIPT method, so that the appropriate FF cut‐off value can be used. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Prenatal diagnosis. Volume 36:Number 4(2016)
- Journal:
- Prenatal diagnosis
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Number 4(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 4 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0036-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 304
- Page End:
- 311
- Publication Date:
- 2016-02-21
- Subjects:
- Prenatal diagnosis -- Periodicals
Fetus -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.32075 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/pd.4780 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0197-3851
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6607.646000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 265.xml