Quantitative analysis of facial palsy using a three-dimensional facial motion measurement system. Issue 4 (August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Katsumi, Sachiyo; Esaki, Shinichi; Hattori, Koosuke; Yamano, Koji; Umezaki, Taizo; Murakami, Shingo
• Is Part Of: Auris nasus larynx. Volume 42:Issue 4(2015)
• Page Start: 275
• Page End: 283
• Publication Date: 2015-08
• Subjects: Three-dimensional analysis -- Facial nerve palsy -- House–Brackmann grading scale -- Yanagihara grading scale; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2015.01.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0385-8146

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The prognosis for facial nerve palsy (FNP) depends on its severity. Currently, many clinicians use the Yanagihara, House–Brackmann, and/or Sunnybrook grading systems to assess FNP. Although these assessments are performed by experts, inter- and intra-observer disagreements have been demonstrated. The quantitative and objective analyses of the degree of FNP would be preferred to monitor functional changes and to plan and evaluate therapeutic interventions in patients with FNP. Numerous two-dimensional (2-D) assessments have been proposed, however, the limitations of 2-D assessment have been reported. The purpose of this study was to introduce a three-dimensional (3-D) image generation system for the analysis of facial nerve palsy (FNP) and to show the correlation between the severity of FNP assessed by this method and two conventional systems. Methods: Five independent facial motions, resting, eyebrow raise, gentle eye closure, full smile with lips open and whistling were recorded with our system and the images were then analyzed using our software. The regional and gross facial symmetries were analyzed. The predicted scores were calculated and compared to the Yanagihara and H–B grading scores. We analyzed 15 normal volunteers and 42 patients with FNP. Results: The results showed that 3-D analysis could measure mouth movement in the anteroposterior direction, whereas two-dimensional analysis could not. The system results showed good correlation with the clinical results from the Yanagihara ( r 2 = 0.86) and House–Brackmann ( r 2 = 0.81) grading scales. Conclusion: This objective method can produce consistent results that align with two conventional systems. Therefore, this method is ideally suited for use in a routine clinical setting.