Factors Influencing Adhesion Formation After Primary Cesarean Delivery [26C]. (May 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Factors Influencing Adhesion Formation After Primary Cesarean Delivery [26C]. (May 2016)
- Main Title:
- Factors Influencing Adhesion Formation After Primary Cesarean Delivery [26C]
- Authors:
- Schiliro, Ashley
Muscat, Jolene C.
Calixte, Rose
Han, Tina K.
Vintzileos, Anthony M. - Abstract:
- Abstract : INTRODUCTION: To determine the association, if any, between obstetrical and surgical factors and adhesion formation after a primary cesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: This is retrospective cohort of patients at a single institution who underwent a primary CD between 2008 and 2010, with a repeat CD by 12/2013. At the time of each CD, an adhesion assessment form was completed, as per the standard of care. The form evaluates the character of adhesions (none [score 0], filmy [score 1], dense [score 2]) in five locations (bowel, fascia to uterus, omentum to uterus, omentum to fascia, bladder to uterus). Patients with an adhesion score greater than or equal to 4 were compared to those patients with fewer adhesions. 38 possible obstetrical and surgical predictors of adhesions were entered into a univariable analysis; then, all significant variables were entered into an adjusted model to determine independent predictors of adhesion formation. RESULTS: 851 patients met inclusion criteria for the study. After multivariable analyses, patients with peritoneal closure (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.14–0.43, P <.001) or rectus muscle closure (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.89, P <.01) at primary CD are less likely to have an adhesion score greater than or equal to 4. No difference was seen with adhesion barrier use (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.76–1.89, P <.45). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that peritoneal and/or rectus muscle closure at the time of CD should be routinely performed, as these are safe,Abstract : INTRODUCTION: To determine the association, if any, between obstetrical and surgical factors and adhesion formation after a primary cesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: This is retrospective cohort of patients at a single institution who underwent a primary CD between 2008 and 2010, with a repeat CD by 12/2013. At the time of each CD, an adhesion assessment form was completed, as per the standard of care. The form evaluates the character of adhesions (none [score 0], filmy [score 1], dense [score 2]) in five locations (bowel, fascia to uterus, omentum to uterus, omentum to fascia, bladder to uterus). Patients with an adhesion score greater than or equal to 4 were compared to those patients with fewer adhesions. 38 possible obstetrical and surgical predictors of adhesions were entered into a univariable analysis; then, all significant variables were entered into an adjusted model to determine independent predictors of adhesion formation. RESULTS: 851 patients met inclusion criteria for the study. After multivariable analyses, patients with peritoneal closure (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.14–0.43, P <.001) or rectus muscle closure (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.89, P <.01) at primary CD are less likely to have an adhesion score greater than or equal to 4. No difference was seen with adhesion barrier use (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.76–1.89, P <.45). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that peritoneal and/or rectus muscle closure at the time of CD should be routinely performed, as these are safe, cost-effective surgical techniques that reduce adhesion formation and may decrease long term risks of operative morbidity. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 127(2016)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Obstetrics and gynecology
- Issue:
- Volume 127(2016)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 127, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 127
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0127-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-05
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/01.AOG.0000483375.94981.ef ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0029-7844
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6208.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 835.xml