Modulation of pain via expectation of its location. (22nd October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stanton, T.R.; Gilpin, H.R.; Reid, E.; Mancini, F.; Spence, C.; Moseley, G.L.
• Is Part Of: European journal of pain. Volume 20:Number 5(2016)
• Page Start: 753
• Page End: 766
• Publication Date: 2015-10-22
• Subjects: Pain -- Periodicals; Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Pain -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; 616.0472
• DOI: 10.1002/ejp.801
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1090-3801

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The spatial precision of expectancy effects on pain is unclear. We hypothesized that expecting nociceptive stimuli at particular skin sites would have an analgesic effect on nociceptive stimuli presented between them (middle zone). Methods: Laser stimuli (evoking pin‐prick pain) were delivered to three discrete skin zones on the forearm, under two conditions. During 'Localization', participants' expectation of stimuli was spatially divided between two locations (expected stimuli in only the outer two skin zones): pain intensity and stimulus location were judged. During 'No‐localization' (control condition), participants had no expectation concerning stimulus location; only pain intensity was rated. Additional experiments assessed the importance of the actual location on the forearm by: shifting all skin zones proximally towards the elbow (control for joint proximity, Experiment 2); adding a fourth zone distally (control for interaction between joint proximity and enhanced distal inhibition, Experiment 3). Results: All experiments demonstrated spatially specific pain modulation, but only Experiment 2 (near elbow) supported our hypothesis: middle zone pain intensity was significantly lower ( p = 0.02) during Localization than No‐localization. Experiment 1 (near wrist) found reduced pain intensity during Localization only for the distal zone ( p = 0.04). Experiment 3 confirmed this effect: reduced pain during Localization occurred only for the most distal zone ( p = 0.046). Conclusion: Expecting a painful stimulus in non‐adjacent skin sites has spatially specific effects on pain modulation, but this reflects an interaction between the expected location of stimulation and the actual location. This suggests a more complex connection between somatotopic maps and nociceptive modulation than previously thought; several distinct mechanisms likely contribute.