Discussion on the concepts in paleoenvironmental reconstruction from coal macerals and petrographic indices. (May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sen, Souvik; Naskar, Sumon; Das, Satyabrata
• Is Part Of: Marine and petroleum geology. Volume 73(2016:May)
• Page Start: 371
• Page End: 391
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Subjects: Coal -- Maceral -- Petrographic indices -- Peat forming environment; Submarine geology -- Periodicals; Petroleum -- Geology -- Periodicals; Géologie sous-marine -- Périodiques; Pétrole -- Géologie -- Périodiques; Petroleum -- Geology; Submarine geology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 551.468
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.03.015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-8172

Abstract

Abstract: Organic facies analyses quantify the coal constituents and plot various associations to discriminate the paleoenvironment for coal bearing successions. This allows the relation of coal composition to mire ecosystems or environments. Coal petrographic models are used extensively to reconstruct the nature of ancient peat forming environments. Many authors proposed relations between specific maceral assemblages and/or micro-lithotypes and peat forming environments. The key controlling factors which affect peat environment include hydrogeology, redox, pH, vegetation type, clastic influx, sedimentation and peat accumulation rate etc. Recent advancements in coal maceral study and organic petrology reveal the pros and cons of the available indices and models. The main reasons for the failure of the petrographic models are – oversimplification of the effects of humification on tissue preservation vs. destruction, the use of post-diagenetic processes (e.g. geochemical gelification) in determining depositional environments, changes in petrographic composition related to floral evolution, geological age, rank increase and compaction, lack of distinction between different inertinite maceral in some models. Here the widely used petrographic indices and models are reviewed based on the observations of several workers and the applicability and concepts of paleo-environmental reconstruction are discussed. A multi-disciplinary approach including petrography, palynology, chemistry etc. has been recommended, which is more logical and scientific than the exclusive use of petrographic composition for paleoenvironmental interpretation. Highlights: We discuss the issues and results from several workers, addresses the facts of different indices for paleoenvironment interpretation. We discuss various aspects of reconstructing paleoenvironment from macerals and coal petrographic compositions. Main reasons for the failure of common petrographic models have been discussed. Multidisciplinary approach to paleoenvironmental reconstruction suggested for further research.