Comparative effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation. Issue 5 (May 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation. Issue 5 (May 2016)
- Main Title:
- Comparative effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation
- Authors:
- Qin, Dingxin
Leef, George
Alam, Mian Bilal
Rattan, Rohit
Munir, Mohamad Bilal
Patel, Divyang
Khattak, Furqan
Adelstein, Evan
Jain, Sandeep K.
Saba, Samir - Abstract:
- Abstract: Introduction: Although there are many different antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) approved for rhythm management of atrial fibrillation (AF), little comparative effectiveness data exist to guide drug selection. Methods: We followed 5952 consecutive AF patients who were prescribed amiodarone ( N = 2266), dronedarone ( N = 488), dofetilide ( N = 539), sotalol ( N = 1718), or class 1C agents ( N = 941) to the primary end point of AF recurrence. Results: Median follow-up time was 18.2 months (range 0.1–101.6 months). Patients who were prescribed amiodarone had the highest, while patients on class 1C agents had the lowest baseline CHA2 DS2 -VASc score, Charlson comorbidity index, and burden of comorbid illnesses including coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive lung disease, chronic kidney disease, or cancer ( p < 0.05 for all comparisons). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, using dronedarone as benchmark, amiodarone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, p < 0.001], class 1C agents (HR 0.70, p < 0.001), and sotalol (HR 0.79, p = 0.008), but not dofetilide (HR 0.87, p = 0.178) were associated with less AF recurrence. In addition, compared to dronedarone, amiodarone and class 1C agents were associated with lower rates of admissions for AF (HR 0.55, p < 0.001 for amiodarone; HR 0.71, p = 0.021 for class 1C agents) and all-cause mortality was lowest in patients treated with class 1C agents (HR 0.42, pAbstract: Introduction: Although there are many different antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) approved for rhythm management of atrial fibrillation (AF), little comparative effectiveness data exist to guide drug selection. Methods: We followed 5952 consecutive AF patients who were prescribed amiodarone ( N = 2266), dronedarone ( N = 488), dofetilide ( N = 539), sotalol ( N = 1718), or class 1C agents ( N = 941) to the primary end point of AF recurrence. Results: Median follow-up time was 18.2 months (range 0.1–101.6 months). Patients who were prescribed amiodarone had the highest, while patients on class 1C agents had the lowest baseline CHA2 DS2 -VASc score, Charlson comorbidity index, and burden of comorbid illnesses including coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive lung disease, chronic kidney disease, or cancer ( p < 0.05 for all comparisons). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, using dronedarone as benchmark, amiodarone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, p < 0.001], class 1C agents (HR 0.70, p < 0.001), and sotalol (HR 0.79, p = 0.008), but not dofetilide (HR 0.87, p = 0.178) were associated with less AF recurrence. In addition, compared to dronedarone, amiodarone and class 1C agents were associated with lower rates of admissions for AF (HR 0.55, p < 0.001 for amiodarone; HR 0.71, p = 0.021 for class 1C agents) and all-cause mortality was lowest in patients treated with class 1C agents (HR 0.42, p = 0.018). The risk of stroke was similar among all groups. Conclusion: Compared with dronedarone, amiodarone, class 1C agents, and sotalol are more effective for rhythm control, while dofetilide had similar efficacy. These findings have important implications for clinical practice. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cardiology. Volume 67:Issue 5(2016:May)
- Journal:
- Journal of cardiology
- Issue:
- Volume 67:Issue 5(2016:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 67, Issue 5 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 67
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0067-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 471
- Page End:
- 476
- Publication Date:
- 2016-05
- Subjects:
- Antiarrhythmic drugs -- Atrial fibrillation -- Comparative effectiveness
Cardiology -- Periodicals
616.12 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09145087 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09145087 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.07.001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0914-5087
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.864200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 881.xml