Denitrification, leaching, and river nitrogen export in the Community Earth System Model. (6th March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nevison, Cynthia; Hess, Peter; Riddick, Stuart; Ward, Dan
• Is Part Of: Journal of advances in modeling earth systems. Volume 8:Number 1(2016)
• Page Start: 272
• Page End: 291
• Publication Date: 2016-03-06
• Subjects: river N export -- community land model -- nitrogen cycle -- community earth system model; Geological modeling -- Periodicals; Climatology -- Periodicals; Geochemical modeling -- Periodicals; 551.5011
• DOI: 10.1002/2015MS000573
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1942-2466

Abstract

Abstract: River nitrogen export is simulated within the Community Earth System Model (CESM) by coupling nitrogen leaching and runoff fluxes from the Community Land Model (CLM) to the River Transport Model (RTM). The coupled CLM‐RTM prognostically simulates the downstream impact of human N cycle perturbation on coastal areas. It also provides a framework for estimating denitrification fluxes of N2 and associated trace gases like N2 O in soils and river sediments. An important limitation of the current model is that it only simulates dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) river export, due to the lack of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and particulate nitrogen (PN) leaching fluxes in CLM. In addition, the partitioning of soil N loss in CLM between the primary loss pathways of denitrification and N leaching/runoff appears heavily skewed toward denitrification compared to other literature estimates, especially in nonagricultural regions, and also varies considerably among the four model configurations presented here. River N export is generally well predicted in the model configurations that include midlatitude crops, but tends to be underpredicted in rivers that are less perturbed by human agriculture. This is especially true in the tropics, where CLM likely underestimates leaching and runoff of all forms of nitrogen. River export of DIN is overpredicted in some relatively unperturbed Arctic rivers, which may result from excessive N inputs to those regions in CLM. Better representation of N loss in CLM can improve confidence in model results with respect to the core model objective of simulating nitrogen limitation of the carbon cycle. Key Points: River N export is modeled prognostically with the coupled Community Land Model‐River Transport Model Nitrogen loss parameterizations in CLM are uncertain, with implications for model C‐N interactions Comparison of modeled and observed river N export can help provide constraints on CLM N loss