Patients' perspectives on the role of their complaints in the regulatory process. (7th May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bouwman, Renée; Bomhoff, Manja; Robben, Paul; Friele, Roland
• Is Part Of: Health expectations. Volume 19:Number 2(2016:Jun.)
• Page Start: 483
• Page End: 496
• Publication Date: 2015-05-07
• Subjects: complaints -- government regulation -- health‐care quality -- health‐care safety -- public participation; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Health planning -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1111/hex.12373
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-6513

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Governments in several countries are facing problems concerning the accountability of regulators in health care. Questions have been raised about how patients' complaints should be valued in the regulatory process. However, it is not known what patients who made complaints expect to achieve in the process of health‐care quality regulation. Objective: To assess expectations and experiences of patients who complained to the regulator. Design: Interviews were conducted with 11 people, and a questionnaire was submitted to 343 people who complained to the Dutch Health‐care Inspectorate. The Inspectorate handled 92 of those complaints. This decision was based on the idea that the Inspectorate should only deal with complaints that relate to 'structural and severe' problems. Results: The response rate was 54%. Self‐reported severity of physical injury of complaints that were not handled was significantly lower than of complaints that were. Most respondents felt that their complaint indicated a structural and severe problem that the Inspectorate should act upon. The desire for penalties or personal satisfaction played a lesser role. Only a minority felt that their complaint had led to improvements in health‐care quality. Conclusions: Patients and the regulator share a common goal: improving health‐care quality. However, patients' perceptions of the complaints' relevance differ from the regulator's perceptions. Regulators should favour more responsive approaches, going beyond assessing against exclusively clinical standards to identify the range of social problems associated with complaints about health care. Long‐term learning commitment through public participation mechanisms can enhance accountability and improve the detection of problems in health care.