Adaptive Motion Planning for Autonomous Rough Terrain Traversal with a Walking Robot. Issue 3 (24th June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Belter, Dominik; Łabęcki, Przemysław; Skrzypczyński, Piotr
• Other Names: Kleiner Alexander guestEditor.; Heintz Fredrik guestEditor.; Tadokoro Satoshi guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of field robotics. Volume 33:Issue 3(2016)
• Page Start: 337
• Page End: 370
• Publication Date: 2015-06-24
• Subjects: Robots, Industrial -- Periodicals; Automatic control -- Periodicals; 629.892
• DOI: 10.1002/rob.21610
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1556-4959

Abstract

Abstract : Achieving full autonomy in a mobile robot requires combining robust environment perception with onboard sensors, efficient environment mapping, and real‐time motion planning. All these tasks become more challenging when we consider a natural, outdoor environment and a robot that has many degrees of freedom (DOF). In this paper, we address the issues of motion planning in a legged robot walking over a rough terrain, using only its onboard sensors to gather the necessary environment model. The proposed solution takes the limited perceptual capabilities of the robot into account. A multisensor system is considered for environment perception. The key idea of the motion planner is to use the dual representation concept of the map: (i) a higher‐level planner applies the A* algorithm for coarse path planning on a low‐resolution elevation grid, and (ii) a lower‐level planner applies the guided‐RRT (rapidly exploring random tree) algorithm to find a sequence of feasible motions on a more precise but smaller map. This paper contributes a new method that can identify the terrain traversability cost to the benefit of the A* algorithm. A probabilistic regression technique is applied for the traversability assessment with the typical RRT‐based motion planner used to explore the space of traversability values. The efficiency of our motion planning approach is demonstrated in simulations that provide ground truth data unavailable in field tests. However, the simulation‐verified approach is then thoroughly tested under real‐world conditions in experiments with two six‐legged walking robots having different perception systems.