A likelihood ratio anomaly detector for identifying within-perimeter computer network attacks. (May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Grana, Justin; Wolpert, David; Neil, Joshua; Xie, Dongping; Bhattacharya, Tanmoy; Bent, Russell
• Is Part Of: Journal of network and computer applications. Volume 66(2016)
• Page Start: 166
• Page End: 179
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Subjects: Anomaly detection -- Computer network defense -- Cyber security -- Likelihood ratio detection -- ROC analysis -- Model misspecification; Microcomputers -- Periodicals; Computer networks -- Periodicals; Application software -- Periodicals; Micro-ordinateurs -- Périodiques; Réseaux d'ordinateurs -- Périodiques; Logiciels d'application -- Périodiques; Application software; Computer networks; Microcomputers; Periodicals; 004.05; 004
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2016.03.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1084-8045

Abstract

Abstract: The rapid detection of attackers within firewalls of enterprise computer networks is of paramount importance. Anomaly detectors address this problem by quantifying deviations from baseline statistical models of normal network behavior and signaling an intrusion when the observed data deviates significantly from the baseline model. However, many anomaly detectors do not take into account plausible attacker behavior. As a result, anomaly detectors are prone to a large number of false positives due to unusual but benign activity. This paper first introduces a stochastic model of attacker behavior which is motivated by real world attacker traversal. Then, we develop a likelihood ratio detector that compares the probability of observed network behavior under normal conditions against the case when an attacker has possibly compromised a subset of hosts within the network. Since the likelihood ratio detector requires integrating over the time each host becomes compromised, we illustrate how to use Monte Carlo methods to compute the requisite integral. We then present Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for various network parameterizations that show for any rate of true positives, the rate of false positives for the likelihood ratio detector is no higher than that of a simple anomaly detector and is often lower. We conclude by demonstrating the superiority of the proposed likelihood ratio detector when the network topologies and parameterizations are extracted from real-world networks.