Metabolic syndrome, glucose tolerance categories and the cardiovascular risk in Spanish population. (April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martínez-Larrad, María Teresa; Corbatón-Anchuelo, Arturo; Fernández-Pérez, Cristina; Lazcano-Redondo, Yera; Escobar-Jiménez, Fernando; Serrano-Ríos, Manuel
• Is Part Of: Diabetes research and clinical practice. Volume 114(2016)
• Page Start: 23
• Page End: 31
• Publication Date: 2016-04
• Subjects: Metabolic syndrome -- Impaired glucose tolerance -- Cardiovascular risk factors; Diabetes -- Periodicals; Diabetes Mellitus -- Periodicals; 616.462
• DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.02.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0168-8227

Abstract

Highlights: The prevalences of prediabetes and MetS in Spain were 25% and 31.2%, respectively. The prevalence of MetS in Spanish females (28.5%) and in males (34.2%). Subjects with IGT showed a higher estimated CVD risk than IFG and IFG/IGT. MetS also increased the CVD-risk estimated by Framingham and SCORE. Abstract: We examined the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), glucose tolerance categories and risk factors of cardiovascular-disease (CVD) in the general Spanish population. We studied 3844 randomly sampled subjects (46% males) aged 35–74 years. Glucose tolerance categories were defined according to the 2003 ADA and MetS according to the Harmonized Consensus Criteria with waist circumference (WC) cut-off-points previously reported in Spanish population (≥94.5/≥89.5 cm for males/females). The prevalences of normoglycemia (NG), impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), IFG and IGT considered together (IFG/IGT), and diabetes mellitus (DM) were 67.6/16.6/5.0/3.3, and 7.5%, respectively. The overall prevalence of MetS was 31.2%. In subjects with NG, IFG, IGT, IFG/IGT, and DM the MetS prevalence's were 16.3/57.1/31.5/66.1, and 74.4% ( p < 0.001), respectively. MetS was more common in males, older subjects, smokers, and/or individuals with obesity, IFG, IFG/IGT, DM, or insulin resistance (HOMA-IR ≥3.8). MetS was less prevalent in individuals with low alcohol intake and/or high education level. Regarding the risk level of CVD estimated by Framingham and SCORE risk charts, IGT had higher estimated CVD-risk than IFG and IFG/IGT. The presence of MetS increases the risk 4.85 times by Framingham and 2.43 times by SCORE. Prevalence of prediabetes (IFG/IGT) and MetS were 25% and 31.2% respectively. Prevalence of MetS has not changed in the past decade in Spanish females, but has slightly increased in males. We found that subjects with IGT showed a higher risk of CVD than IFG and IFG/IGT according to the Framingham and SCORE. MetS increased the CVD-risk previously estimated by Framingham and SCORE.