Closed chest human aortic valve removal and replacement: Technical feasibility and one year follow-up. (15th May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vola, Marco; Fuzellier, Jean-François; Campisi, Salvatore; Roche, Fréderic; Favre, Jean-Pierre; Isaaz, Karl; Morel, Jérôme; Gerbay, Antoine
• Is Part Of: International journal of cardiology. Volume 211(2016)
• Page Start: 71
• Page End: 78
• Publication Date: 2016-05-15
• Subjects: Aortic valve replacement -- Thoracoscopy -- Minimally invasive surgery -- Sutureless bioprosthesis -- TAVI; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.149
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-5273

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement has so far required a minithoracotomy or a ministernotomy. We present here the first series of totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (TEAVR). Methods: Between June 2013 and April 2015, 14 consecutive patients (12 males, mean age = 76 ± 5.4 years) with a mean EuroSCORE II of 2.72 ± 0.03% underwent TEAVR. A five trocar setting was used in all patients: after ablation of the native valve, a Nitinol stented sutureless 3f Enable Medtronic valve, compressed into the main working trocar, was introduced into the thorax and then expanded in the aortic root. Results: Among the 14 patients, a thoracoscopic approach was successful in 13 (92.8%) and conversion into an open surgery using the right anterior minithoracotomy was necessary to close the aortotomy in one case. Mean cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary (CPB) times were 112 ± 18 and 161 ± 31 min, respectively. All patients left the surgical unit within 8 days after the operation without any paravalvular leakage. There was no paravalvular regurgitation, conductive block or any major adverse event at a mean follow-up of 10 ± 4 months (range 2–16). Conclusions: TEAVR is feasible and safe in a selected subset of patients. Closed chest surgery has the potential to become the future approach of the isolated aortic valve replacement in low risk patients but further technical refinement and larger studies are necessary to reduce operative durations and enhance reproducibility.