CT angiography of the aorta using 80 kVp in combination with sinogram‐affirmed iterative reconstruction and automated tube current modulation: Effects on image quality and radiation dose. Issue 2 (7th January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boos, Johannes; Aissa, Joel; Lanzman, Rotem S; Heusch, Philipp; Schimmöller, Lars; Schleich, Christoph; Thomas, Christoph; Antoch, Gerald; Kröpil, Patric
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. Volume 60:Issue 2(2016:Apr.)
• Page Start: 187
• Page End: 193
• Publication Date: 2016-01-07
• Subjects: aorta -- computed tomography -- diagnostic imaging -- radiation dose -- vascular; Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- Australasia -- Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12425
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1754-9477

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate image quality and radiation dose of a CT angiography (CTA) protocol using 80 kVp in combination with iterative reconstruction and automated tube current modulation. Methods: Ninety‐five aortic CTA examinations were included in this study. A novel 80 kVp aortic CTA‐protocol with iterative reconstruction was introduced in our department in March 2012 for patients with a body mass index (BMI) below 32 kg/m 2 . The first 72 consecutive examinations were retrospectively assigned to group A (56 patients, 42 men, 14 women, mean age 69.6 ± 10.7years, BMI range 19.7–31.1 kg/m 2 ). For comparison, the last 23 consecutive examinations performed with the old protocol (100 kVp) were assigned to group B (21 patients, 13 men, 8 women, mean age 67.4 ± 11.1years, BMI range 19.7–31.9 kg/m 2 ). Thoracic and abdominal contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and aortic attenuation were assessed. Subjective image quality was rated on a 5‐point scale (1 = non diagnostic ; 5 = excellent ). Furthermore, dose length product (DLP) and volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol ) were analysed. Results: All examinations achieved diagnostic image quality. Attenuation of the aorta was significantly higher in group A compared with B (thoracic: 443.5 ± 90.5 Hounsfield units (HU) vs. 296.0 ± 61.0 HU; abdominal: 426.3 ± 94.2 HU vs. 283.6 ± 60.5 HU; P < 0.05, respectively). CNR, SNR and subjective image quality were comparable between both groups (CNR: 12.8 ± 3.7 vs. 13.0 ± 7.4; SNR 14.4 ± 3.9 vs. 14.9 ± 8.2; subjective image quality: 4.3 ± 0.6 vs. 4.5 ± 0.6; P > 0.05, respectively). CTDIvol and DLP were significantly lower in group A (1.9 ± 0.5 mGy; 139.2 ± 41.1 mGy × cm) as compared with group B (4.2 ± 1.4 mGy; 292.1 ± 91.5 mGy × cm; P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Low‐dose CTA of the aorta using 80 kVp with iterative reconstruction enables a significant dose reduction of up to 50% compared with a 100 kVp protocol in patients with a BMI below 32 kg/m 2 while diagnostic image quality is maintained.