Impact of the calculation algorithm on biexponential fitting of diffusion‐weighted MRI in upper abdominal organs. Issue 5 (8th June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of the calculation algorithm on biexponential fitting of diffusion‐weighted MRI in upper abdominal organs. Issue 5 (8th June 2015)
- Main Title:
- Impact of the calculation algorithm on biexponential fitting of diffusion‐weighted MRI in upper abdominal organs
- Authors:
- Barbieri, Sebastiano
Donati, Olivio F.
Froehlich, Johannes M.
Thoeny, Harriet C. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: To compare the variability, precision, and accuracy of six different algorithms (Levenberg–Marquardt, Trust‐Region, Fixed‐ Dp, Segmented‐Unconstrained, Segmented‐Constrained, and Bayesian‐Probability) for computing intravoxel‐incoherent‐motion‐related parameters in upper abdominal organs. Methods: Following the acquisition of abdominal diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance images of 10 healthy men, six distinct algorithms were employed to compute intravoxel‐incoherent‐motion‐related parameters in the left and right liver lobe, pancreas, spleen, renal cortex, and renal medulla. Algorithms were evaluated regarding inter‐reader and intersubject variability. Comparability of results was assessed by analyses of variance. The algorithms' precision and accuracy were investigated on simulated data. Results: A Bayesian‐Probability based approach was associated with very low inter‐reader variability (average Intraclass Correlation Coefficients: 96.5–99.6%), the lowest inter‐subject variability (Coefficients of Variation [CV] for the pure diffusion coefficient D t : 3.8% in the renal medulla, 6.6% in the renal cortex, 10.4–12.1% in the left and right liver lobe, 15.3% in the spleen, 15.8% in the pancreas; for the perfusion fraction F p : 15.5% on average; for the pseudodiffusion coefficient D p : 25.8% on average), and the highest precision and accuracy. Results differed significantly ( P < 0.05) across algorithms in all anatomical regions. Conclusion: TheAbstract : Purpose: To compare the variability, precision, and accuracy of six different algorithms (Levenberg–Marquardt, Trust‐Region, Fixed‐ Dp, Segmented‐Unconstrained, Segmented‐Constrained, and Bayesian‐Probability) for computing intravoxel‐incoherent‐motion‐related parameters in upper abdominal organs. Methods: Following the acquisition of abdominal diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance images of 10 healthy men, six distinct algorithms were employed to compute intravoxel‐incoherent‐motion‐related parameters in the left and right liver lobe, pancreas, spleen, renal cortex, and renal medulla. Algorithms were evaluated regarding inter‐reader and intersubject variability. Comparability of results was assessed by analyses of variance. The algorithms' precision and accuracy were investigated on simulated data. Results: A Bayesian‐Probability based approach was associated with very low inter‐reader variability (average Intraclass Correlation Coefficients: 96.5–99.6%), the lowest inter‐subject variability (Coefficients of Variation [CV] for the pure diffusion coefficient D t : 3.8% in the renal medulla, 6.6% in the renal cortex, 10.4–12.1% in the left and right liver lobe, 15.3% in the spleen, 15.8% in the pancreas; for the perfusion fraction F p : 15.5% on average; for the pseudodiffusion coefficient D p : 25.8% on average), and the highest precision and accuracy. Results differed significantly ( P < 0.05) across algorithms in all anatomical regions. Conclusion: The Bayesian‐Probability algorithm should be preferred when computing intravoxel‐incoherent‐motion‐related parameters in upper abdominal organs. Magn Reson Med 75:2175–2184, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 75:Issue 5(2016)
- Journal:
- Magnetic resonance in medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 75:Issue 5(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 75, Issue 5 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 75
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0075-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 2175
- Page End:
- 2184
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06-08
- Subjects:
- abdominal -- intravoxel‐incoherent‐motion -- algorithm -- least‐squares -- Bayesian -- segmented
Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals
Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals
616.07548 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2594 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/mrm.25765 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0740-3194
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5337.798000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2405.xml