Public Perceptions of Whistleblowing. (2nd January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Heumann, Milton; Friedes, Al; Redlawsk, David; Cassak, Lance; Kesari, Aniket
• Is Part Of: Public integrity. Volume 18:Number 1(2016)
• Page Start: 6
• Page End: 24
• Publication Date: 2016-01-02
• Subjects: whistleblowing -- whistleblower retaliation -- organizational wrongdoing -- value of whistleblowing; Civil service ethics -- United States -- Periodicals; Public administration -- Moral and ethical aspects -- United States -- Periodicals; Political ethics -- United States -- Periodicals; Civil service ethics -- Periodicals; Public administration -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Periodicals; Political ethics -- Periodicals; Civil service ethics; Political ethics; Public administration -- Moral and ethical aspects; United States; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; CIVIL SERVICE; MORAL ASPECTS; POLITICAL ETHICS; Periodicals; 172
• DOI: 10.1080/10999922.2015.1093397
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-9922

Abstract

Abstract : This article reports the results of a two-pronged exploration of public perceptions of whistleblowing, the first using a statewide public opinion poll, and the second, a laboratory experiment in which a multistage scenario determined respondents' support for an employee's protest actions and their classification of the employee as a whistleblower. One substantial finding is that self-interest taints the purity of the employee's motivation making it less likely for respondents to classify the employee as a whistleblower. The employee's gender, the type of action protested, and whether the employee worked in the public or private sector were randomly manipulated, with no significant differences in respondents' support or classification of whistleblowing. Implications for future research are discussed.