Comparison of reptile sampling in Iran with pitfall versus double-ended funnel traps. Issue 1 (2nd January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hosseinian Yousefkhani, Seyyed Saeed; Yousefi, Masoud
• Is Part Of: Zoology in the Middle East. Volume 62:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 46
• Page End: 50
• Publication Date: 2016-01-02
• Subjects: Lizards -- Northern Khorasan province -- species richness -- trap effectiveness; Zoology -- Middle East -- Periodicals; 591.95605
• DOI: 10.1080/09397140.2016.1144278
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0939-7140

Abstract

Abstract : In north Khorasan province, Iran, we compared the effectiveness of two types of traps for collecting reptiles: funnel traps and pitfall traps. Three stations were monitored over three 10-day periods and in total 544 individuals (including 200 recaptures) belonging to 5 species and 4 families of lizards (Lacertidae) were collected. Funnel traps with 280 captures were more efficient than pitfall traps with 264 captures, but the differences between the two traps are not significant. Three species were captured most often in the three different stations respectively: station 1, Bunopus crassicauda (22% relative frequency); station 2, Eremias fasciata (29% relative frequency); and station 3, Trapelus agilis (32% relative frequency). Shannon species richness indices were higher for pitfall than funnel traps (i.e., 1.45 vs. 1.40), but the difference was not significant. Pitfall traps were better for capturing species that search widely for food, while the funnel traps preferentially captured species that climb plants, such as Trapelus agilis . We recommend using both types of trap to capture the various types of species in any one region.