Lost opportunities to identify and treat HIV‐positive patients: results from a baseline assessment of provider‐initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) in Malawi. Issue 4 (29th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ahmed, Saeed; Schwarz, Monica; Flick, Robert J.; Rees, Chris A.; Harawa, Mwelura; Simon, Katie; Robison, Jeff A.; Kazembe, Peter N.; Kim, Maria H.
• Is Part Of: Tropical medicine & international health. Volume 21:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 479
• Page End: 485
• Publication Date: 2016-02-29
• Subjects: provider‐initiated testing and counselling -- HIV -- Malawi -- HIV testing and counselling -- register, PITC; conseil et dépistage à l'initiative du soignant -- VIH -- Malawi -- conseil et dépistage du VIH -- registre; asesoramiento y prueba iniciado por el proveedor -- VIH -- Malawi -- consejería y prueba del VIH -- registro; Tropical medicine -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; 616.988
• DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12671
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1360-2276

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To assess implementation of provider‐initiated testing and counselling (PITC) for HIV in Malawi. Methods: A review of PITC practices within 118 departments in 12 Ministry of Health (MoH) facilities across Malawi was conducted. Information on PITC practices was collected via a health facility survey. Data describing patient visits and HIV tests were abstracted from routinely collected programme data. Results: Reported PITC practices were highly variable. Most providers practiced symptom‐based PITC. Antenatal clinics and maternity wards reported widespread use of routine opt‐out PITC. In 2014, there was approximately 1 HIV test for every 15 clinic visits. HIV status was ascertained in 94.3% (5293/5615) of patients at tuberculosis clinics, 92.6% (30 675/33 142) of patients at antenatal clinics and 49.4% (6871/13 914) of patients at sexually transmitted infection clinics. Reported challenges to delivering PITC included test kit shortages (71/71 providers), insufficient physical space (58/71) and inadequate number of HIV counsellors (32/71) while providers from inpatient units cited the inability to test on weekends. Conclusions: Various models of PITC currently exist at MoH facilities in Malawi. Only antenatal and maternity clinics demonstrated high rates of routine opt‐out PITC. The low ratio of facility visits to HIV tests suggests missed opportunities for HIV testing. However, the high proportion of patients at TB and antenatal clinics with known HIV status suggests that routine PITC is feasible. These results underscore the need to develop clear, standardised PITC policy and protocols, and to address obstacles of limited health commodities, infrastructure and human resources.