Defining marine important bird areas: Testing the foraging radius approach. (April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Soanes, L.M.; Bright, J.A.; Angel, L.P.; Arnould, J.P.Y.; Bolton, M.; Berlincourt, M.; Lascelles, B.; Owen, E.; Simon-Bouhet, B.; Green, J.A.
• Is Part Of: Biological conservation. Volume 196(2016)
• Page Start: 69
• Page End: 79
• Publication Date: 2016-04
• Subjects: GPS tracking -- seabirds -- home-range area -- Marine Protected Area -- conservation; Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-3207

Abstract

Abstract: Recent international initiatives have promoted a number of different approaches to identify marine Important Bird and biodiversity Areas (IBAs), which are important areas for foraging, migrating or over-wintering seabirds. The 'Foraging Radius Approach' is one of these and uses known foraging range and habitat preferences to predict the size and location of foraging areas around breeding colonies. Here we assess the performance of the Foraging Radius Approach using GPS tracking data from six seabird species with a variety of foraging modes. For each species we compared the population home-range areas of our six study species with the home-range areas defined using the Foraging Radius Approach. We also assessed whether basic information on depth preferences from tracking data could improve these home-range area estimates. Foraging Radius Approach home-range areas based on maximum foraging radii encompassed the entire population home-range of five out of six of our study species but overestimated the size of the population home-range area in every case. The mean maximum foraging radius overestimated the population home-range areas by a factor of 4–14 for five of the six species whilst the mean foraging radius overestimated the population home-range area for half of the species and underestimated for the rest. In the absence of other data, the Foraging Radius Approach appears to provide a reasonable basis for preliminary marine IBA identification. We suggest that using the mean value of all previously reported maximum foraging radii, informed by basic depth preferences provides the most appropriate prediction, balancing the needs of seabirds with efficient use of marine space. Highlights: We test the application of previously collected seabird foraging data to predict important foraging areas of un-tracked populations GPS tracking data from five seabird species representing different foraging guilds was analysed Foraging depth preferences were found for European shag, black-legged kittiwake, masked booby, little penguin and short-tailed shearwater The mean foraging range recorded in previous studies provides the most accurate prediction for defining important foraging areas, balancing the needs of seabirds with the desire to make efficient use of space.