Do we need new high-risk criteria for surgically treated renal cancer patients to improve the outcome of future clinical trials in the adjuvant setting? Results of a comprehensive analysis based on the multicenter CORONA database. Issue 5 (May 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Do we need new high-risk criteria for surgically treated renal cancer patients to improve the outcome of future clinical trials in the adjuvant setting? Results of a comprehensive analysis based on the multicenter CORONA database. Issue 5 (May 2016)
- Main Title:
- Do we need new high-risk criteria for surgically treated renal cancer patients to improve the outcome of future clinical trials in the adjuvant setting? Results of a comprehensive analysis based on the multicenter CORONA database
- Authors:
- Wolff, I.
May, M.
Hoschke, B.
Zigeuner, R.
Cindolo, L.
Hutterer, G.
Schips, L.
De Cobelli, O.
Rocco, B.
De Nunzio, C.
Tubaro, A.
Coman, I.
Feciche, B.
Truss, M.
Dalpiaz, O.
Figenshau, R.S.
Madison, K.
Sánchez-Chapado, M.
Santiago Martin, M.D.C.
Salzano, L.
Lotrecchiano, G.
Shariat, S.F.
Hohenfellner, M.
Waidelich, R.
Stief, C.
Miller, K.
Pahernik, S.
Brookman-May, S. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Since there is still an unmet need for potent adjuvant strategies for renal cancer patients with high progression risk after surgery, several targeted therapies are currently evaluated in this setting. We analyzed whether inclusion criteria of contemporary trials (ARISER, ASSURE, SORCE, EVEREST, PROTECT, S-TRAC, ATLAS) correctly identify high-risk patients. Methods: The study group comprised 8873 patients of the international CORONA-database after surgery for non-metastatic renal cancer without any adjuvant treatment. Patients were divided into potentially eligible high-risk and assumable low-risk patients who didn't meet inclusion criteria of contemporary adjuvant clinical trials. The ability of various inclusion criteria for disease-free survival (DFS) prediction was evaluated by Harrell's c-index. Results: During a median follow-up of 53 months 15.2% of patients experienced recurrence (5-year-DFS 84%). By application of trial inclusion criteria, 24% (S-TRAC) to 47% (SORCE) of patients would have been eligible for enrollment. Actual recurrence rates of eligible patients ranged between 29% (SORCE) and 37% (S-TRAC) opposed to <10% in excluded patients. Highest Hazard Ratio for selection criteria was proven for the SORCE-trial (HR 6.42; p < 0.001), while ASSURE and EVEREST reached the highest c-index for DFS prediction (both 0.73). In a separate multivariate Cox-model, two risk-groups were identified with a maximum difference in 5-year-DFS (94% vs. 61%).Abstract: Background: Since there is still an unmet need for potent adjuvant strategies for renal cancer patients with high progression risk after surgery, several targeted therapies are currently evaluated in this setting. We analyzed whether inclusion criteria of contemporary trials (ARISER, ASSURE, SORCE, EVEREST, PROTECT, S-TRAC, ATLAS) correctly identify high-risk patients. Methods: The study group comprised 8873 patients of the international CORONA-database after surgery for non-metastatic renal cancer without any adjuvant treatment. Patients were divided into potentially eligible high-risk and assumable low-risk patients who didn't meet inclusion criteria of contemporary adjuvant clinical trials. The ability of various inclusion criteria for disease-free survival (DFS) prediction was evaluated by Harrell's c-index. Results: During a median follow-up of 53 months 15.2% of patients experienced recurrence (5-year-DFS 84%). By application of trial inclusion criteria, 24% (S-TRAC) to 47% (SORCE) of patients would have been eligible for enrollment. Actual recurrence rates of eligible patients ranged between 29% (SORCE) and 37% (S-TRAC) opposed to <10% in excluded patients. Highest Hazard Ratio for selection criteria was proven for the SORCE-trial (HR 6.42; p < 0.001), while ASSURE and EVEREST reached the highest c-index for DFS prediction (both 0.73). In a separate multivariate Cox-model, two risk-groups were identified with a maximum difference in 5-year-DFS (94% vs. 61%). Conclusion: Results of contemporary adjuvant clinical trials will not be comparable as inclusion criteria differ significantly. Risk assessment according to our model might improve patient selection in clinical trials by defining a high-risk group (28% of all patients) with a 5-year-recurrence rate of almost 40%. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 42:Issue 5(2016:May)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 42:Issue 5(2016:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 42, Issue 5 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0042-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 744
- Page End:
- 750
- Publication Date:
- 2016-05
- Subjects:
- Renal cell cancer -- Nephrectomy -- Disease recurrence -- Adjuvant therapy -- Phase-3-trials -- Targeted agents
Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.009 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 692.xml