Etiology of postanesthetic and postsedation events on the inpatient ward: data from a rapid response team at a tertiary care children's hospital. Issue 5 (12th March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barry, N'Diris; M. Miller, Karen; Ryshen, Gregory; Uffman, Joshua; Taghon, Thomas A.; Tobias, Joseph D.
• Editors: Cravero, Joseph
• Is Part Of: Paediatric anaesthesia. Volume 26:Issue 5(2016:May)
• Page Start: 504
• Page End: 511
• Publication Date: 2016-03-12
• Subjects: assessment and consultation team -- Rapid Response Team -- perioperative complications -- respiratory insufficiency -- ASA status; Pediatric anesthesia -- Periodicals; 617.96798
• DOI: 10.1111/pan.12874
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1155-5645

Abstract

Summary: Introduction: The goal of this study was to identify the etiology of events and demographics of patients that experience complications requiring activation of the Rapid Response Team (RRT) during the first 24 h following anesthetic care. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the Quality Improvement database from the Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine at Nationwide Children's Hospital. The database was searched to identify those patients who had a RRT evaluation activated within 24 h of receiving anesthesia or procedural sedation. These patients' charts were reviewed to obtain demographic information, etiology of the RRT call, and outcomes. Results: The study cohort included 106 RRT calls that were made over a 3‐year period. Six patients were excluded from analysis due to incomplete datasets. One hundred patients remained for analysis including 60 males and 40 females. Patients ranged in age from 0.08 to 31.21 years (7.8 ± 7.7 years, median 5.3 years). Seventy‐one patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) status 3 or 4 and 29 patients were ASA status 1 or 2. Five calls were made for patients who had undergone procedural sedation while the other 95 were on patients who received general anesthesia. The average time to the RRT call after the end of anesthetic care was 11.4 ± 6.6 h. Respiratory concern was the most common reason for RRT initiation, accounting for 71 of the 100 calls. Forty‐nine patients had a recent respiratory illness, chronic respiratory‐related disease, or history of preterm birth. Fifty patients (50%) were transferred to a higher level of care following the RRT consult. There was no significant difference between age, gender, ASA status, or etiology of the event for patients transferred vs those who were not. A significant difference was noted in the Pediatric Early Warning Score of patients transferred to a higher level of care in comparison to patients who remained on the floor (4 ± 2 vs 3 ± 2, P = 0.0097). Conclusion: RRT calls were most common for respiratory concerns. High ASA status, general anesthesia administration, and the presence of acute or chronic conditions prior to anesthetic administration predispose a patient to perioperative complications resulting in the need for an RRT call. Abstract :