Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid composite on fatigued patients with elevated liver function and/or fatty liver: a multi‐centre, randomised, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial. Issue 4 (20th March 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid composite on fatigued patients with elevated liver function and/or fatty liver: a multi‐centre, randomised, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial. Issue 4 (20th March 2016)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid composite on fatigued patients with elevated liver function and/or fatty liver: a multi‐centre, randomised, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial
- Authors:
- Oh, B.
Choi, W. S.
Park, S. B.
Cho, B.
Yang, Y. J.
Lee, E. S.
Lee, J. H. - Abstract:
- Summary: Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid composite (URSA‐S) on fatigue in patients with elevated liver function tests and/or fatty liver disease. Methods: In this multi‐centre randomised double‐blinded placebo‐controlled trial, 168 adults who were diagnosed with fatigue based on our criteria and had elevated liver function tests (but not > 5 times the normal level) and/or fatty liver on ultrasonography, were randomised to either the placebo or URSA‐S administration group. The rate of improvement of checklist individual strength (CIS) using a cut‐off of 76 points at the end of the study (8 weeks), the change in fatigue scale [CIS score and visual analogue scale (VAS)] were evaluated. The adverse effects of URSA‐S were also recorded. Results: The rate of CIS improvement at the end‐point was 79.76% and 45.68% in the therapy and placebo groups, respectively (p < 0.05). The fatigue recovery rate of the CIS score and VAS were higher in the therapy (−25.44 ± 18.57, −27.84 ± 2.70) than in the placebo group (−16.59 ± 17.29, −19.46 ± 2.81) (p < 0.05). The difference in fatigue recovery rate between the therapy and placebo groups was significant after 8 weeks. When analysed separately in patients with abnormal liver function tests and fatty liver disease, the fatigue recovery rate of the CIS score and VAS at 8 weeks was higher in the therapy than in the placebo group (p < 0.05). The frequency of adverse events in the therapy group was notSummary: Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid composite (URSA‐S) on fatigue in patients with elevated liver function tests and/or fatty liver disease. Methods: In this multi‐centre randomised double‐blinded placebo‐controlled trial, 168 adults who were diagnosed with fatigue based on our criteria and had elevated liver function tests (but not > 5 times the normal level) and/or fatty liver on ultrasonography, were randomised to either the placebo or URSA‐S administration group. The rate of improvement of checklist individual strength (CIS) using a cut‐off of 76 points at the end of the study (8 weeks), the change in fatigue scale [CIS score and visual analogue scale (VAS)] were evaluated. The adverse effects of URSA‐S were also recorded. Results: The rate of CIS improvement at the end‐point was 79.76% and 45.68% in the therapy and placebo groups, respectively (p < 0.05). The fatigue recovery rate of the CIS score and VAS were higher in the therapy (−25.44 ± 18.57, −27.84 ± 2.70) than in the placebo group (−16.59 ± 17.29, −19.46 ± 2.81) (p < 0.05). The difference in fatigue recovery rate between the therapy and placebo groups was significant after 8 weeks. When analysed separately in patients with abnormal liver function tests and fatty liver disease, the fatigue recovery rate of the CIS score and VAS at 8 weeks was higher in the therapy than in the placebo group (p < 0.05). The frequency of adverse events in the therapy group was not significantly higher than that in the placebo group. Conclusion: URSA‐S is effective for alleviating fatigue in patients with liver dysfunction and/or fatty liver. The adverse effects of URSA‐S are not significant. This study is registered athttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT02415777. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of clinical practice. Volume 70:Issue 4(2016)
- Journal:
- International journal of clinical practice
- Issue:
- Volume 70:Issue 4(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 70, Issue 4 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 70
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0070-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 302
- Page End:
- 311
- Publication Date:
- 2016-03-20
- Subjects:
- Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/ijcp ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=journal&eissn=1742-1241 ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1368-5031&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1742-1241 ↗
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijclp/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ijcp.12790 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1368-5031
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.172160
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 47.xml