Eco‐hydraulic Evaluation of a Whitewater Park as a Fish Passage Barrier1. (9th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fox, Brian D.; Bledsoe, Brian P.; Kolden, Eleanor; Kondratieff, Matthew C.; Myrick, Christopher A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Water Resources Association. Volume 52:Number 2(2016:Apr.)
• Page Start: 420
• Page End: 442
• Publication Date: 2016-02-09
• Subjects: whitewater park -- fish passage -- barrier -- hydraulic modeling -- flow complexity -- design; Water-supply -- Periodicals; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Water resources development -- Periodicals; Water resources development -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 333.9100973
• DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12397
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1093-474X

Abstract

Abstract: Whitewater parks (WWPs) typically consist of instream structures that enhance recreational boating by constricting flow into a steep chute that generates a hydraulic jump in a downstream pool. Concerns have been raised that high velocities resulting from WWPs may be inhibiting fish movement during critical life stages. We evaluated the effects of WWPs on upstream fish passage by concurrently monitoring fish movement and hydraulic conditions at three WWP structures and three adjacent natural control (CR) sites in a wadeable river in northern Colorado. Fish movement was tracked with a network of Passive Integrated Transponder antennas over a 14‐month period. Individual fishes ( n = 1, 639), including brown trout ( Salmo trutta ) and rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ), were tagged and released within WWP and CR sites. Detailed hydraulic conditions occurring during the study period were evaluated with a fully 3D model. Results reveal the WWPs monitored in this study are not a complete barrier to upstream salmonid movement, but differences in passage efficiency from release location range from 29 to 44% in WWP sites and 37 to 63% for CR sites and the suppression of movement is related to body length. Small numbers of monitored nonsalmonids were inadequate to directly observe effects on their movement; however, it is highly probable that movement of smaller native fishes is also suppressed. Hydraulic modeling helps in the design of WWP structures that protect fish passage.