Does oral carbohydrate supplementation improve labour outcome? A systematic review and individual patient data meta‐analysis. (March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Malin, GL; Bugg, GJ; Thornton, J; Taylor, MA; Grauwen, N; Devlieger, R; Kardel, KR; Kubli, M; Tranmer, JE; Jones, NW
• Is Part Of: BJOG. Volume 123:Number 4(2016:Apr.)
• Page Start: 510
• Page End: 517
• Publication Date: 2016-03
• Subjects: Carbohydrates -- individual patient data meta‐analysis -- labour outcome; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Gynecology -- Periodicals; 618
• DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13728
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1470-0328

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Labour is a period of significant physical activity. The importance of carbohydrate intake to improve outcome has been recognised in sports medicine and general surgery. Objectives: To assess the effect of oral carbohydrate supplementation on labour outcomes. Search strategy: MEDLINE (1966–2014), Embase, the Cochrane Library and clinical trial registries. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCT) of women randomised to receive oral carbohydrate in labour (<6 cm dilated), versus placebo or standard care. Data collection and analysis: Authors were contacted to provide data. Individual patient data meta‐analyses were performed to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main results: Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Six authors responded, four supplied data ( n = 691). Three studies used isotonic drinks (one placebo‐controlled, two compared with standard care), and one an advice booklet regarding carbohydrate intake. The mean difference in energy intake between the intervention and control groups was small [three studies, 195 kilocalories (kcal), 95% CI 118–273]. There was no difference in the risk of caesarean section (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.83– 1.61), instrumental birth (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.96–1.66) or syntocinon augmentation (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86–1.13). Length of labour was similar (mean difference −3.15 minutes, 95% CI −35.14 to 41.95). Restricting the analysis to primigravid women did not affect the result. Oral carbohydrates did not increase the risk of vomiting (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.78–1.52) or 1‐minute Apgar score <7 (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.82–1.83). Authors' conclusion: Oral carbohydrate supplements in small quantities did not alter labour outcome. Tweetable abstract: Oral carbohydrate does not affect labour. But the difference between intervention and control equals 10 teaspoons sugar. Tweetable abstract: Oral carbohydrate does not affect labour. But the difference between intervention and control equals 10 teaspoons sugar.