Influence of diversion stoma on surgical outcome and recurrence rates in patients with rectovaginal fistula – A retrospective cohort study. (January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lambertz, A.; Lüken, B.; Ulmer, T.F.; Böhm, G.; Neumann, U.P.; Klink, C.D.; Krones, C.J.
• Is Part Of: International journal of surgery. Volume 25(2016)
• Page Start: 114
• Page End: 117
• Publication Date: 2016-01
• Subjects: Rectovaginal fistula -- Diversion stoma -- Outcome -- Recurrence rates; Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1743-9191

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Rectovaginal fistula is an extremely distressing condition for the patients. There is still no generally accepted standard surgical treatment strategy. Especially the influence of diversion stoma creation on patients' outcome remains controversial. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the influences of diversion stoma on the outcome of patients treated because of rectovaginal fistula with special regard to perioperative complications and recurrence rates. Methods: Between 2003 and 2013, all patients treated due to rectovaginal fistula in our institutions were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 81 procedures were performed in 62 patients. Procedures were divided into two groups depending on the presence of a diversion stoma or not (diversion stoma, n = 42 vs. no stoma, n = 39). Results: The overall rate of fistula recurrence was 44% without statistical significance in-between the study groups (49 vs. 38%; p = 0.603). Diversion stoma had no influence on complication rates, wound infections or number of operative revisions. Patients treated with diversion stoma had significantly higher ASA-scores (2.6 ± 0.6 vs. 2.1 ± 0.8; p = 0.011), higher rates of malignoma (58 vs. 17%; p = 0.001) and larger sizes of fistula (1.67 ± 0.08 vs. 1.51 ± 0.46 mm; p = 0.012). The in-hospital stay was significantly longer in these patients (30 ± 66 vs. 15 ± 15 days; p = 0.023). Conclusions: Our data suggest that diversion stoma creation does not influence the outcome of patients with rectovaginal fistula with special regard to rates of fistula recurrence. On the other hand it is mainly used in complex cases of sick patients and larger fistula sizes. Prospective clinical studies need to be conducted to reinforce these findings. Highlights: Diversion stoma creation does not influence the outcome of patients with rectovaginal fistula. Diversion stoma does not reduce rates of fistula recurrence. Diversion stoma is mainly used in complex cases of sick patients and larger fistula sizes.