Validation of the alcohol use item banks from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). (1st April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pilkonis, Paul A.; Yu, Lan; Dodds, Nathan E.; Johnston, Kelly L.; Lawrence, Suzanne M.; Daley, Dennis C.
• Is Part Of: Drug and alcohol dependence. Volume 161(2016)
• Page Start: 316
• Page End: 322
• Publication Date: 2016-04-01
• Subjects: Alcohol use -- Measurement -- Item response theory -- Patient-reported outcomes -- PROMIS; Drug abuse -- Periodicals; Alcoholism -- Periodicals; 616.86
• DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0376-8716

Abstract

Highlights: PROMIS alcohol use item banks were used successfully as computerized adaptive tests. The median number of items required for the alcohol use CAT was 5. The correlation between the alcohol use CAT and the AUDIT was .79. The PROMIS health status profile provided important prognostic information. Abstract: Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS ® ) includes five item banks for alcohol use. There are limited data, however, regarding their validity (e.g., convergent validity, responsiveness to change). To provide such data, we conducted a prospective study with 225 outpatients being treated for substance abuse. Methods: Assessments were completed shortly after intake and at 1-month and 3-month follow-ups. The alcohol item banks were administered as computerized adaptive tests (CATs). Fourteen CATs and one six-item short form were also administered from eight other PROMIS domains to generate a comprehensive health status profile. After modeling treatment outcome for the sample as a whole, correlates of outcome from the PROMIS health status profile were examined. Results: For convergent validity, the largest correlation emerged between the PROMIS alcohol use score and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test ( r = .79 at intake). Regarding treatment outcome, there were modest changes across the target problem of alcohol use and other domains of the PROMIS health status profile. However, significant heterogeneity was found in initial severity of drinking and in rates of change for both abstinence and severity of drinking during follow-up. This heterogeneity was associated with demographic (e.g., gender) and health-profile (e.g., emotional support, social participation) variables. Conclusions: The results demonstrated the validity of PROMIS CATs, which require only 4–6 items in each domain. This efficiency makes it feasible to use a comprehensive health status profile within the substance use treatment setting, providing important prognostic information regarding abstinence and severity of drinking.