Male breast cancer: Looking for better prognostic subgroups. (April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abreu, Miguel Henriques; Afonso, Noémia; Abreu, Pedro Henriques; Menezes, Francisco; Lopes, Paula; Henrique, Rui; Pereira, Deolinda; Lopes, Carlos
• Is Part Of: Breast. Volume 26(2016)
• Page Start: 18
• Page End: 24
• Publication Date: 2016-04
• Subjects: Male breast cancer -- Prognostic subgroups -- Survival; Breast -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Breast -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Breast -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.12.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-9776

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Male Breast Cancer (MBC) remains a poor understood disease. Prognostic factors are not well established and specific prognostic subgroups are warranted. Patients/methods: Retrospectively revision of 111 cases treated in the same Cancer Center. Blinded-central pathological revision with immunohistochemical (IHQ) analysis for estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and androgen (AR) receptors, HER2, ki67 and p53 was done. Cox regression model was used for uni/multivariate survival analysis. Two classifications of Female Breast Cancer (FBC) subgroups (based in ER, PR, HER2, 2000 classification, and in ER, PR, HER2, ki67, 2013 classification) were used to achieve their prognostic value in MBC patients. Hierarchical clustering was performed to define subgroups based on the six-IHQ panel. Results: According to FBC classifications, the majority of tumors were luminal: A (89.2%; 60.0%) and B (7.2%; 35.8%). Triple negative phenotype was infrequent (2.7%; 3.2%) and HER2 enriched, non-luminal, was rare (≤1% in both). In multivariate analysis the poor prognostic factors were: size >2 cm (HR:1.8; 95%CI:1.0–3.4years, p = 0.049), absence of ER (HR:4.9; 95%CI:1.7–14.3years, p = 0.004) and presence of distant metastasis (HR:5.3; 95%CI:2.2–3.1years, p < 0.001). FBC subtypes were independent prognostic factors (p = 0.009, p = 0.046), but when analyzed only luminal groups, prognosis did not differ regardless the classification used (p > 0.20). Clustering defined different subgroups, that have prognostic value in multivariate analysis (p = 0.005), with better survival in ER/PR+, AR-, HER2-and ki67/p53 low group (median: 11.5 years; 95%CI: 6.2–16.8 years) and worst in PR-group (median:4.5 years; 95%CI: 1.6–7.8 years). Conclusion: FBC subtypes do not give the same prognostic information in MBC even in luminal groups. Two subgroups with distinct prognosis were identified in a common six-IHQ panel. Future studies must achieve their real prognostic value in these patients. Highlights: FBC subgroups did not provide the same prognostic information in MBC. First work that defines MBC subgroups based on a six-routinely IHQ panel. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified two principle prognostic subgroups. Better survival in patients with ER/PR+, AR−, HER2−, ki67/p53 low. Worst survival in patients without expression of PR.