Test and validation of methods to sample and detect human virus from environmental surfaces using norovirus as a model virus. Issue 4 (April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ibfelt, T.; Frandsen, T.; Permin, A.; Andersen, L.P.; Schultz, A.C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of hospital infection. Volume 92:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 378
• Page End: 384
• Publication Date: 2016-04
• Subjects: Environmental samples -- Mengovirus -- Norovirus -- Real-time polymerase chain reaction; Cross infection -- Periodicals; Cross infection -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Nosocomial infections -- Periodicals; Nosocomial infections -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- prevention & control -- Periodicals; Infection Control -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 614.44
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.01.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-6701

Abstract

Summary: Background: Viruses cause a major proportion of human infections, especially gastroenteritis and respiratory infections in children and adults. Indirect transmission between humans via environmental surfaces may play a role in infections, but methods to investigate this have been sparse. Aim: To validate and test efficient and reliable procedures to detect multiple human pathogenic viruses on surfaces. Methods: The study was divided into two parts. In Part A, six combinations of three different swabs (consisting of cotton, foamed cotton, or polyester head) and two different elution methods (direct lysis or immersion in alkaline glycine buffer before lysis) were tested for efficient recovery of human norovirus GII.7 and mengovirus from artificially contaminated surfaces. In Part B we determined the detection limit for norovirus GI.1 and GII.3 using the best procedure found in Part A linked with a commercial multiplex real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction detection assay. Findings: Combining the polyester swab with direct lysis allowed recovery down to 100 and 10 genome copies/cm 2 of norovirus GI.1 and GII.3, respectively. This procedure resulted in the significant highest recovery of both norovirus and mengovirus, whereas no differences in amplification efficiencies were observed between the different procedures. Conclusion: The results indicate that it is possible to detect low concentrations of virus on environmental surfaces. We therefore suggest that a polyester swab, followed by direct lysis, combined with a multiplex qPCR detection assay is an efficient screening tool that merits study of different respiratory and gastrointestinal viruses on environment surfaces.