Estimating 3D L5/S1 moments and ground reaction forces during trunk bending using a full-body ambulatory inertial motion capture system. Issue 6 (11th April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Faber, G.S.; Chang, C.C.; Kingma, I.; Dennerlein, J.T.; van Dieën, J.H.
• Is Part Of: Journal of biomechanics. Volume 49:Issue 6(2016)
• Page Start: 904
• Page End: 912
• Publication Date: 2016-04-11
• Subjects: Inertial measurement unit (IMU) -- Inertial sensors -- Low back loading -- Physical exposure -- Occupational biomechanics; Animal mechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Mécanique animale -- Périodiques; Biomécanique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 571.4305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.042
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9290

Abstract

Abstract: Inertial motion capture (IMC) systems have become increasingly popular for ambulatory movement analysis. However, few studies have attempted to use these measurement techniques to estimate kinetic variables, such as joint moments and ground reaction forces (GRFs). Therefore, we investigated the performance of a full-body ambulatory IMC system in estimating 3D L5/S1 moments and GRFs during symmetric, asymmetric and fast trunk bending, performed by nine male participants. Using an ambulatory IMC system (Xsens/MVN), L5/S1 moments were estimated based on the upper-body segment kinematics using a top-down inverse dynamics analysis, and GRFs were estimated based on full-body segment accelerations. As a reference, a laboratory measurement system was utilized: GRFs were measured with Kistler force plates (FPs), and L5/S1 moments were calculated using a bottom-up inverse dynamics model based on FP data and lower-body kinematics measured with an optical motion capture system (OMC). Correspondence between the OMC+FP and IMC systems was quantified by calculating root-mean-square errors (RMSerrors) of moment/force time series and the interclass correlation (ICC) of the absolute peak moments/forces. Averaged over subjects, L5/S1 moment RMSerrors remained below 10 Nm (about 5% of the peak extension moment) and 3D GRF RMSerrors remained below 20 N (about 2% of the peak vertical force). ICCs were high for the peak L5/S1 extension moment (0.971) and vertical GRF (0.998). Due to lower amplitudes, smaller ICCs were found for the peak asymmetric L5/S1 moments (0.690–0.781) and horizontal GRFs (0.559–0.948). In conclusion, close correspondence was found between the ambulatory IMC-based and laboratory-based estimates of back load.