Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students. Issue 1 (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stoll, Kathrin H.; Hauck, Yvonne L.; Hall, Wendy A.
• Is Part Of: Women and birth. Volume 29:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: e33
• Page End: e38
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: Midwifery -- Home birth -- Caesarean birth -- Australia -- Consumer preferences; Midwives -- Periodicals; Pregnancy -- Periodicals; Midwifery -- Periodicals; Pregnancy -- Periodicals; 618.2
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.07.187
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1871-5192

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Australian caesarean birth rates have exceeded 30% in most states and are approaching 45%, on average, in private hospitals. Australian midwifery practice occurs almost exclusively in hospitals; less than 3% of women deliver at home or in birthing centres. It is unclear whether the trend towards hospital-based, high interventionist birth reflects preferences of the next generation of maternity care consumers. Aim and methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional online survey of 760 Western Australian (WA) university students in 2014, to examine their preferences for place of birth, type of maternity care, mode of birth and attitudes towards birth. Findings: More students who preferred midwives (35.8%) had vaginal birth intentions, contested statements that birth is unpredictable and risky, and valued patient–provider relationships. More students who preferred obstetricians (21.8%) expressed concerns about childbirth safety, feared birth, held favourable views towards obstetric technology, and expressed concerns about the impact of pregnancy and birth on the female body. One in 8 students preferred out-of-hospital birth settings, supporting consumer demand for midwife-attended births at home and in birthing centres. Stories and experiences of friends and family shaped students' care provider preferences, rather than the media or information learned at school. Conclusion: Students who express preferences for midwives have significantly different views about birth compared to students who prefer obstetricians. Increasing access to midwifery care in all settings (hospital, birthing centre and home) is a cost effective strategy to decrease obstetric interventions for low risk women and a desirable option for the next generation.