The influence of external forcing on subdecadal variability of regional surface temperature in CMIP5 simulations of the last millennium. Issue 4 (27th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Le, Thanh; Sjolte, Jesper; Muscheler, Raimund
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 121:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 1671
• Page End: 1682
• Publication Date: 2016-02-27
• Subjects: solar forcing -- volcanic forcing -- greenhouse gases radiative forcing -- last millennium -- Granger causality -- near‐surface air temperature; Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2015JD024423
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

Abstract: We use Granger causality to investigate the influences of external forcings on subdecadal variability of regional near‐surface air temperature (SAT) in past millennium simulations (period 850–1850 A.D.) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models. Our results strengthen the conclusion for robust influence of volcanic forcing on SAT during preindustrial times of the last millennium. The SAT response to solar variations is detected in tropical and subtropical regions. In other regions, this response is weak. The impact of greenhouse gases (GHGs) radiative forcing to regional SAT is weak and uncertain. This is most probably due to the low amplitude of the variations in GHGs and hence weak GHGs forcing during the preindustrial millennium. The low agreement between models in simulating the impacts of solar variations on SAT in several regions suggests the different dynamical responses in these models, possibly associated with inaccurate parameterization of the processes related to solar forcing. Our analysis suggests that internal climate variability played a more significant role than external forcings in short‐term SAT variability in the regions of the North Atlantic, the North Pacific, the Arctic, the Antarctic Peninsula, and its surrounding oceans. The possibility of long‐term impacts of external forcings on SAT and the uncertainties that might be contained due to effects of internal climate modes other than El Niño–Southern Oscillation underscore the necessity for a more detailed understanding of the dynamical response of SAT to external forcings. Key Points: Solar forcing has causal impact on temperature of tropical and subtropical regions Robust impact of volcanic forcing and weak impact of greenhouse gases forcing in CMIP5 simulations Inconsistency in simulating the impacts of solar and greenhouse gases forcings