An ecoclimatic framework for evaluating the resilience of vegetation to water deficit. (9th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mitchell, Patrick J.; O'Grady, Anthony P.; Pinkard, Elizabeth A.; Brodribb, Timothy J.; Arndt, Stefan K.; Blackman, Chris J.; Duursma, Remko A.; Fensham, Rod J.; Hilbert, David W.; Nitschke, Craig R.; Norris, Jaymie; Roxburgh, Stephen H.; Ruthrof, Katinka X.; Tissue, David T.
• Is Part Of: Global change biology. Volume 22:Number 5(2016:May)
• Page Start: 1677
• Page End: 1689
• Publication Date: 2016-02-09
• Subjects: climate vulnerability -- climatic thresholds -- drought mortality -- drought resistance -- forest ecosystems -- plant hydraulics -- recruitment -- resilience -- tree die‐off; Climatic changes -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Troposphere -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals; Eutrophication -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13177
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1354-1013

Abstract

Abstract: The surge in global efforts to understand the causes and consequences of drought on forest ecosystems has tended to focus on specific impacts such as mortality. We propose an ecoclimatic framework that takes a broader view of the ecological relevance of water deficits, linking elements of exposure and resilience to cumulative impacts on a range of ecosystem processes. This ecoclimatic framework is underpinned by two hypotheses: (i) exposure to water deficit can be represented probabilistically and used to estimate exposure thresholds across different vegetation types or ecosystems; and (ii) the cumulative impact of a series of water deficit events is defined by attributes governing the resistance and recovery of the affected processes. We present case studies comprising Pinus edulis and Eucalyptus globulus, tree species with contrasting ecological strategies, which demonstrate how links between exposure and resilience can be examined within our proposed framework. These examples reveal how climatic thresholds can be defined along a continuum of vegetation functional responses to water deficit regimes. The strength of this framework lies in identifying climatic thresholds on vegetation function in the absence of more complete mechanistic understanding, thereby guiding the formulation, application and benchmarking of more detailed modelling.